About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

221 IRET Congressional Advisory 1 (2007)

handle is hein.taxfoundation/iretcgadv0218 and id is 1 raw text is: INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH ON THE ECONOMICS OF TAXATION
IRET is a non-profit 501 (c)(3) economic policy research and educational organization devoted to informing
the public about policies thait will promote growth and efficient operation of the market economy.

March 22, 2007

Advisory No. 221

SCHIP FUNDING UP IN SMOKE? - TOBACCO TAXES
NOT THE WAY TO FUND CHILDREN'S HEALTH INSURANCE

During the Budget Resolution debate this week,
Senator Gordon Smith (R-OR) is expected to offer an
amendment to raise the federal tobacco products tax,
which could boost the tax on cigarettes from $0.39 a
pack to as much as $1 a pack. The added revenue
would be intended for an expansion of the Schip
program (State Children's Health Insurance Program).
Schip provides federal money to assist the states in
providing health insurance for children in families
that are of modest income but too well-off to qualify
for Medicaid.
The budget baseline includes an expected
renewal of the Schip program at previous levels of
coverage, about $25 billion over 5 years. However,
many Senators want to expand the program. Budget
Committee Chairman Senator Kent Conrad (D-ND)
has included a reserve fund for Schip, suggesting
that an additional $50 billion over five years be
authorized to cover an additional 8.3 million children
(about $1,200 per child). It would bring the total
federal aid to $75 billion, but only if offsets are
found. Senator Smith's amendment suggests that a
tobacco tax increase could be used as an offset.
Under the Senate Paygo rules, any proposed
expansion of an entitlement or reduction in baseline
revenues must be matched by a cut in another
entitlement or a tax hike, even if the program
expansion or revenue reduction was authorized in the
Budget Resolution. If not, the proposal is subject to
a point of order and would require a 60-vote super
majority to be adopted. Trimming discretionary
spending is not a recognized offset.

Conversely, if an offset for a program expansion
or a tax reduction is found, then the program or tax
cut does not have to have been mentioned in the
Budget Resolution to be in order.   Any such
language in the Budget Resolution is merely
laudatory and suggestive, a sort of sense of the
Senate. It is not binding.
Furthermore, within the revenue and spending
limits allocated to each category of spending by the
Budget Resolution, the specific tax and spending
decisions taken to conform to these floors and
ceilings are up to the several authorizing Committees,
or, for revenues, up to the Finance Committee. They
are not binding if dictated in the Budget Resolution.
For all these reasons, any reserve fund
recommended by the Chairman that requires offsets,
and any tax recommended by floor amendment to
fund a particular program, are purely advisory.
Having said that, would it make sense 1) to
triple funding for Schip, and 2) to pay for the
expansion with an increase in the tobacco products
tax? No and no again.
1) More money for Schip is being urged by the
states in large part because they have over-spent on
the program.
0 The federal aid was targeted at children in
families with income of up to twice the poverty level.
Several states have expanded their programs to
include children in families with up to three or even

S    I      g6~        I         ~ee

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most