About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

168 IRET Congressional Advisory 1 (2004)

handle is hein.taxfoundation/iretcgadv0165 and id is 1 raw text is: INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH ON THE ECONOMICS OF TAXATION
IRET is a non-profit 501 (c)(3) economic policy research and educational organization devoted to informing
the public about policies thait will promote growth and efficient operation of the market economy.

March 22, 2004

Advisory No. 168

ETI REPEAL SHOULD BE PASSED AND MOVED TO CONFERENCE

The House and the Senate are trying to move,
however slowly, to resolve the international legal
problems created by the World Trade Organization
(WTO) ruling that the Extraterritorial Income (ETI)
provision of the U.S. tax code constitutes an illegal
export subsidy.  Under the WTO    ruling, the
European Union (EU) has begun gradually to impose
countervailing duties on selected U.S. exports, and
these duties will increase each month up to a $4
billion annual rate until the United States repeals the
ETI provisions.
The House is refining the revenue offsets to be
added to the Ways and Means bill, and the Senate is
working on procedures relating to the Finance
Committee version, with an eye toward floor votes
this month. It is important to get the bills to
conference to resolve differences and to get this
issue behind us.
Both bills repeal the ETI and adopt some
additional revenue raisers. Both use the majority of
the money to reduce tax rates on U.S. manufacturing,
and both use much of the rest to ease and simplify
the punitive and complicated U.S. tax treatment of
foreign source income.
However, the structure of the Senate tax rate
relief for manufacturing has an odd protectionist
twist, and should be abandoned in favor of the
House version. In addition, the House bill does a
better job of putting U.S. firms on an equal footing
with their foreign competition when operating in
Europe and around the world.

Bills provide tax rate relief for manufacturing.
The House bill phases in a lower 32 percent
corporate tax rate on U.S. source manufacturing
income of firms of any size by 2007. It also phases
in a 32 percent corporate rate for all corporations,
manufacturing or not, with less than $20 million in
income by 2012. The House bill also addresses
certain unrealistic depreciation schedules, expands
the size of companies exempt from the AMT and
ends the 90 percent limitations on the use of net
operating losses and foreign tax credits against the
AMT.
The Senate bill provides a maximum reduction
in the top corporate tax rate to 31.5 percent for
manufacturing firms by excluding ten percent of U.S.
source manufacturing income from tax (cutting 3.5
percentage points off the 35 percent corporate tax
rate). Non-corporate manufacturers get the same
exclusion. Note that the rate reduction only applies
to U.S. source income.
In addition, however, the Senate bill's exclusion
would be reduced for firms with foreign income. It
could be taken only in proportion to the ratio of U.S.
to global earnings of the company. For example, a
firm with 60 percent U.S. income and 40 percent
foreign income would get to exclude only 6 percent
of its U.S. manufacturing income from tax. That
would reduce its rate reduction to 2.1 percentage
points, and its effective tax rate would be 32.9
percent. This further restriction in the rate cut, when
the rate cut was already restricted to U.S. source

S  I   gg~    g

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most