About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

146 IRET Congressional Advisory 1 (2003)

handle is hein.taxfoundation/iretcgadv0143 and id is 1 raw text is: INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH ON THE ECONOMICS OF TAXATION
IRET is a non-profit 501 (c)(3) economic policy research and educational organization devoted to informing
the public about policies thait will promote growth and efficient operation of the market economy.

January 7, 2003

Advisory No. 146

THE BUSH TAX PLAN AND THE HOUSE DEMOCRATIC
LEADERSHIP ALTERNATIVE

President Bush has proposed a larger-than-
expected program of tax relief aimed at hastening the
economic recovery and promoting long term growth.
The major growth elements of the plan -
accelerating scheduled tax rate cuts, ending the
double taxation of dividends, expanding expensing
for small businesses - would indeed push the
economy's growth buttons. They would provide
the sort of incentives that promote economic
expansion  and   would   increase  investment,
productivity, jobs, and wages both in the short run
and for the longer term.  They would also be
consistent with fundamental tax reform, which means
reducing the biases against saving and investment
found in the current broad-based income tax
system.
Other features of the Bush plan, more minor in
cost and economic effect, address social issues (the
marriage penalty) or spread the wealth of the tax
cut to people with limited tax liabilities, or assist the
unemployed.    These latter proposals may be
necessary to help ensure passage of the program, and
to ease hardship among the unemployed. However,
these provisions would not, by themselves, provide
incentives to increase economic activity or jobs. Any
pump-priming which old-style analysis might
attribute to these provisions is a mirage.
The smaller Democratic tax cut alternative
introduced on January 6 by the House Democratic
leadership consists mainly of one-time refundable tax
rebates, extended unemployment assistance, and aid
to the states. The plan is mostly aimed at generating
a quick boost in consumer and state spending in
2003, and is the old, ineffective pump-priming

approach at work. The Democratic plan contains
virtually none of the incentives that would actually
succeed in expanding economic activity.
Cost is not the measure of effectiveness.
The Bush plan would cost $674 billion over ten
years (not counting the revenue effect of additional
growth.) The Democratic alternative would cost
$136 billion over ten years, all up front. The dollar
amounts of the plans are less important than how
they are structured to affect incentives. The Bush
plan is not only larger than the Democratic
alternative; it is far better structured to promote
economic growth and employment.
The President's plan:
- Speed up the 2001 tax reductions that have not yet
taken effect.
* The marginal tax rate reductions due in 2004
and 2006 would become effective, retroactively,
on January 1, 2003. The top tax brackets would
fall to 25%, 28%, 33%, and 35%.
* Marriage penalty relief scheduled to phase in
through 2009 would become effective in 2003.
(It would accelerate the scheduled expansion of
the 10% bracket for all filers and the scheduled
widening of the 15% bracket and standard
deduction for married couples to twice the
amounts allowed for single filers.)
* The child credit would jump from $600 to
$1,000 per child this year instead of in 2010.

S    I     gg~       g

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most