About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

2 IRET Congressional Advisory 1 (1991)

handle is hein.taxfoundation/iretcgadv0002 and id is 1 raw text is: October 8, 1991 No. 2
PRESIDENT BUSH'S NUCLEAR
ARMS INITIATIVE IS NO EXCUSE
FOR A DOMESTIC SPENDING
SPREE
The Bush Administration's step-down in
military preparedness recognizes, it is to be hoped
accurately, that the Soviet military threat has
substantially diminished. This is one of the very
rare instances in which government programs are
being pruned back because the need for them has
decreased.
President Bush's announcement of dramatic,
unilateral cuts in U.S. nuclear forces was followed
immediately by demands for major increases in
domestic government spending programs. As a
New York Times headline reported, Calls to
review budget pact rise; Bush's move to reduce
arms opens door... At a time when government
expenditures, taxes, and budget deficits are all
setting records, it is hard to imagine a less
appropriate response.
Whatever defense spending cuts are made
possible by improved international conditions
should be devoted to cutting taxes or reducing the
deficit, not to throwing more money at expensive,
ineffective  domestic spending  programs or
dreaming up new ones. Still less should the

military cutbacks be seized upon as an excuse for
gutting the spending restraints included in last
year's budget agreement.  Although the new
budget enforcement provisions are weaker than the
old Gramm-Rudman constraints, they do exert
some expenditure restraint and are better than
nothing. That is why some policy makers are so
eager to break them.
A predictable consequence of trashing the
budget accord is that a flood of new domestic
spending would be unleashed. For every budget
dollar saved on defense, several would be added to
domestic programs. The perverse results would be
escalating federal budget deficits and renewed calls
for higher taxes that would further retard
productivity and growth. The peace dividend
would be squandered and then some.
Excessive domestic spending increases are
especially likely because the military savings from
Bush's initiative tend to be exaggerated. For the
most part equipment that has already been
purchased will be retired or used less intensively.
This is analogous to closing off a room in a house
to reduce heating costs.    It means lower
maintenance and operating costs in the near term.
The big-ticket savings will not come until future
years, when less military equipment will need to
be replaced.
During the cold war, heavy U.S. military
spending was a drain, albeit a necessary one, on
U.S.   living  standards  and   international
competitiveness. The drop in defense spending is
welcome economic news because, with fewer
resources being devoted to military uses, more
labor and capital resources will be freed for non-
military purposes. If the government passes the
savings on to the productive private sector, the
infusion of resources will lower production costs
and raise output.

Institute for
Research on the
Economics of
Taxation

IRET is a non-profit, tax exempt 501(c)(3) economic policy research and educational organization devoted to informing the
public about policies that will promote economic growth and efficient operation of the free market economy.
1730 K Street, N.W., Suite 910, Washington, D.C. 20006
Voice 202-463-1400 * Fax 202-463-6199 0 Internet www.iret.org

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most