About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

William and Francis Sadler, Complainants, v. Thomas B. Hoover, Sylvanus Chambers, and Samuel H. Dinkins, Partners by the Style of Thomas B. Hoover and Company U.S. 646 (1849)

handle is hein.slavery/ussccases0283 and id is 1 raw text is: 646 SUPREME COURT. Sadler et al. v. Hoover et al. Ordei. This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record of the Circuit Court of the United States for the Dis- trict of Kentucky, and was argued by counsel. On considera- tion whereof, it is now here ordered and decreed by this court, that the 'decree of the said Circuit Court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.with costs. WILLIAM' AND FRANcis SADLER, COMPLAINANTS, v. THoAAs B. HOOVER, SYLVANuS CHAMBERS, AND SAMUEL H. DINKINS, PART. HERS BY THE STYLE OF TuoMAs B. HoovER AND CoxPANY. Where an appeal from a Circuit Court, sitting in chancery, is brought up to this court upon a certificata of division in opinion, and the certificate states that the court was not able to agree in opinion, one of the judges being of opinion that a decree should be rendered for the complainants, and the other that a decree should be rendered for the defendants, this was not such a distinct statement of the point or points upon which the judgesdiffered as would give this court jurisdiction. The appeal must, therefore,.be dismissed, for want of jurisdiction. THIS case -came up, on' a certificate of division, from, the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Mississippi. The following is the statement of facts agreed upon in the court belowj by the counsel for the respective parties, and sent up with the record. NM. SADLER and FRANCIS SADLER,) V. In Chancery. THOMAS B. HOOVER and others. In the Circuit- Court of the United States for the Southern District of Mississippi. The bill states that at May term, 1839, of the Circuit Court, the defendants, Thomas B. Hoover & Co.,'recovered judgment against them, and one Francis Ross, their surety, for $ 3,501.84. debt, and $ 383.65 damages, with interest theregn from the 17th of May, 1839, and costs of suit; and at the same term, another judgment against them, and one W. D. Henry, astheir surety, for $ 7,881.66, with interest from the 17th of May, 1839, and costs of -suit. That executions issued on said judgments, and forthcoming bonds have been given with one Robert Ridley, as security in each case, and that said bonds were returned for- feited to the November term, 1839, and executions about to issue thereon; that the instruments of writing on which these

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most