About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

John C. Yerger, Appellant, v. William H. Jones, and Robert S. Brandon, Executors of William Brandon, deceased U.S. 30 (1854)

handle is hein.slavery/ussccases0225 and id is 1 raw text is: 80                 SUPREM1E        COURT.
Yerger v. Jones et al.
JOHN C. YERGER, APPELLANT, V. WILLIAM I. JONES, AND
ROBERT S. BRANDON, EXECUTORS OF' WILLIAm            BRANDON,
DECEASED.
Where a person who was actipg as guardian to a minor, but without any l'gal an-
thority, being indebted to the minor, contracted to purchase real estate for the bene-
fit of his wird, and transferred his own property in part payment therefor, the ward
cannot claim to receive from the vendor the amount of property so transferred.
He can either complete the purchase by paying the balance of the purchase-money,
or set aside the contract and look to his guardian for reimbursement; but in te ab-
sence of fraud, he cannot compel the vendur to returnsuckpart of the purchase-
mouey as had been paid by the guardian.
THIS was an appeal from     the District Court of the United
States for the Northern District of Alabama, sitting as a court
of equity.
It was a bill filed by John C. Yerger, a minor, suing by his
next friend, against William Brandon in -his lifetime, and aftei
his death revived against his executors.
The material facts in the case were -not disputed; but the
controversy depended upon the construction put upon those
facts.
In 1835, Albert Yerger, the father of the appellant, and .a
citizen of Tennessee, made a nuncupative will and died. In this
will he expressed his desire that, with certain exceptions, all his
property should be equally divided between his wife and son.
There was also this clause-in it; and he also stated he wished
Col. James W. Cpmp td manage his plantation, and to have
discretionary power as to its management, and to sell it if he
thought it most beneficial to do so; and he desired, and declared
his will to be, that his' son should have his plantation.
Camp removed into      Madison county, Alabama, at some
period which is not exactly stated in the record, but probably
about 1837. He carried with him      some eight or ten negroes,
which belonged to the boy.
In August, 1842, and May, 1843, Camp executed two deeds
of trust to James W. McClung, for the benefit of certain cre-
ditors.
. On the 14th of August, 1843, McClung had a sale of the pro-
perty, when William Brandon purchased i:he tract of land upon
which Camp lived, containing nine hundred and sixty acres.
On the 23d of August, 1848, Camp made an arrangement
with Brandon to this effect, viz. that Carap should repurchase
the land from Brandon for eight thousand dollars, give his note
for that sum payable in tWo years with interest, and convey cer-

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most