About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 Samuel J. Tilden, The Union: Its Dangers: And How They Can Be Averted 1 (1860)

handle is hein.slavery/udhtc0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 






THE


UNION!


ITS DANGERS!!


         AND HOW THEY CAN BE AVERTED.



LETTER FROM SAMUEL J. TILDEN
                                      TO

               HON. WILLIAM KENT.
                                    4 =


To  the Ifon. Willim Aeht:
   Dear Sir: Among  my early memories of public
 affairs, during the tariff and nullification contro-
 vesies, I recoiject the illustrious name of your fa-
 father, Jauies Kent, signed to a call for a meeting
 of the citizens of New York, to recommend to Con-
 gress the adoption of measures ot'conciliation tow-
 ards our brethren of the South. The association
 recurs to my mind as often as I think of your name
 on the Union electoral ticket, which I consider a
 most wise and necessary endeavor to rescue our
 country in a far more perilous political conjuncture.
 i had no agency in putting it there; but I know it
 represents no partisan interest, prejudice or pas-
 sion, no man's vanity or ambitioi, and still less any
 illiberal opinion or feeling towards natives of foreign
 lands who have chosen this for their home. It re-
 presents nothing less worthy or less noble than pa-
 triotic devotion to the country, and serious and
 well-considered soliciude for the welfare of the
 hitherto fortunate people of these, as yet, United
 States. ' I share the sentiments which animate you
 in the present crisis. I recall your desire when
 last we met, that I should express to our citizens
 the convictions often avowed to you. An occasion
 has arisen which commits me to do so.  I have
 chosen the form of a letter; I dedicate that letter
 to you. It is a testimony of my respect and affec-
 tion, and that we think the same things concerning
 our country. Yourinterestin the great theme will
 compensate all deficiencies in the offering.
              THE USE OF PARTIES.
  The tendency of parties is to draw the various po-
litical elements into two divisions, and to equalize
those divisions. The minority adopts enough  of
the ideas of the majority to attract those who are
nearest to the line of division; and the majority, in
struggling to retain them, makes concessions. The
issue is thus constantly shifting  with the waver-
ing tide of battle, uptil the policy, which at last
prevails has bepome adjusted so as nearly to repre-
sent the average sense of the whole people. It is
rare in our political experiene that the differ-
ence between the majority and the minority equals


five per cent. of the whole number;  extremely
rare except in cases where the issue on which the
parties form is made up to suit specially some lo-
cality. In shaping the policy which emerges from
the conflict, the minority acts a part scarcely less
important than the majority; and the dissentients
are thus prepared to accept the result.
        THE PROCESS OF SELF-GOVERNMENT.
  Such is the process by which the will of all the
parts of the community is collected, averaged and
represented in the policy finally agreed upon. This
is the method of self-government.
         WHY  SELF-GOVERNMENT IS BEST.
  The reason why self-government is better than
government  by any  one man,  or by  a foreign
people, is that the policy evolved by this process
is generally better adapted to the actual condition
of the society on which it is to operate. Govern-
ment by  one man often fails to understand, but it
usually defers. Government by a foreign people
neither understands nor defers. It has no adapta-
tion to the wants or temper of the governed. It is,
therefore, about the worst government that can be
imagined.
THE FEDERATIVE SYSTEM OF LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT.
  Our  fathers understood this truth. They had
tried the experiment. They  had been driven to
revolution by George. the Third, said to be the
 most honest man in his own dominions, and by
the genial Lord North, and had seen how cordially
the British people sustained whatever was worst in
all the policy of monarch and minister. They fore-
saw that a single government, exercising all the
powers of society over the people destined to oc-
cupy so vast a region as the United States, and em-
bracing the elements of such diversities of interest,
industry, opinion, habits and manners, would be in-
tolerable to bear and impossible to continue. They,
therefore, largely adopted the federative idea in the
mixed system which they established; and vesting
only the powers appertaining to our foreign rela-
tions and to certain specified common objects of a
domestic nature in a federative agency, they left the
great residuary mass of governmental functions to
the several states.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most