HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.
![handle is hein.slavery/ssactsengr0001 and id is 1 raw text is: DONALDSON V. BECKETT [1774]
sending the appellants to a trial at law as to the execution of the deed-poll, it seemed
to have been understood, that if the [128] deed was duly executed, the appellants
were entitled to relief thereon ; for otherwise such trial was altogether unnecessary.
That though no other consideration but natural love and affection was expressed
in the deed-poll, yet there was manifestly another consideration for it, namely, the
appellant Robert's abridging himself of the power he had over his own estates, by
agreeing to settle them upon his wife for life; with remainder to her son in tail. And
though a chose en action is not assignable, yet nothing is more frequent than the
establishing such assignments in a Court of Equity; and in that respect, the respon-
dents ought to be considered as trustees for the appellants. That the cross bill
ought to have been dismissed with costs, not only because no relief was given thereon,
but because the allegations of it appeared, by the verdict, to be false and groundless :
it ought also to be discountenanced, on account of the extraordinary and unusual
management of the respondents, in examining witnesses with a view to relief upon a
bill of discovery only, and in applying for and obtaining leave to amend this bill, as
a matter of course, after publication had actually passed.
On the other side it was contended (C. Talbot, N. Fazakerley) to have been Mr.
Penne's-intention, to reserve to himself a power during his life, of calling in all or any
part of the money secured by this bond; and that by the deed he intended only to
give the appellant Elizabeth so much of that money, as he should think fit to leave
outstanding at the time of his death. That it appeared from the many endeavours
which Mr. Penne from time to time made use of to get the appellant Robert arrested
on the bond, that he meant to call in all the money thereby secured, and that no part
thereof should remain uncalled in at the time of his death, and consequently, that
neither of the appellants should have any benefit thereof. And that the artful
endeavours of the appellant Robert to prevent being arrested, ought not to turn
to his benefit, or to the diminution of Mr. Penne's estate.
. After hearing counsel on this appeal, it was ORDERED and ADJUDGED, that the same
should be dismissed, and the decree therein complained of, affirmed. (Jour. vol.
23. p. 671.)
[129] BOOKS.
ALEXANDER DONALDSON, and Another-Aellants; THOMAS BECKETT, and
Others--espondents [22d February 1774].
[Mew's Dig. iv. 512 ; Millar v. Taylor, 1769, 4 Burr. 2303; 17 Cobbett Parl. Hist.
954, 1003. Copyright Act, 1842 (5 & 6 Vict. c. 45), s. 3. 15 Geo. III. c. 53.]
[The copy-right of books is only under the statute of 8 Ann, c. 19, whereby
the sole right of printing and disposing of copies is vested in the author,
or his assigns, for fourteen years from the first publication. But if the
author be living at the expiration of that term, then the right returns
to him for another term of fourteen years.-But this law does not extend to
either of the Universities of Oxford or Cambridge, or to the Colleges of
Eton, Westminster, or Winchester, who have a perpetuity in all copies
belonging to them.]
James Thomson, esq. deceased, was in his lifetime the author of a tragedy called
Sophonisba, and also of a poem intitled Spring.-In January 1729, Andrew Millar,
deceased, contracted with Mr. Thomson for the purchase of this tragedy and poem ;
and by indenture dated the 16th of January 1729, Mr. Thomson, in consideration
of £137 10s. paid to him by Millar, did assign to Millar, his executors, administrators,
and assigns, the true copies of the said tragedy and poem, and the sole and exclusive
837
HI MDW.](ViewImageLocal?handle=hein.slavery/ssactsengr0001&div=1&collection=&method=preview&ext=.png&size=3)