About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

2010 Washington Attorney General Reports and Opinions 1 (2010)

handle is hein.sag/sagwa201001 and id is 1 raw text is: Rob McKenna                                         4 S                              Attorney General of Washington
LAW ENFORCEMENT-LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES-Use Of Asset Forfeiture
Funds For Accreditation And Reaccreditation Of Law Enforcement Agencies
Law enforcement agencies can use the net proceeds of asset forfeitures under
RCW 10.105.010 for accreditation, reaccreditation, and necessary associated training
which serves to improve law enforcement activity, provided that such funding does not
supplant existing funding sources. However, assets forfeited pursuant to other statutes for
which the use of funds is more tightly restricted can only be used for accreditation and
training purposes, if the subject matter is closely related to the purposes of the applicable
forfeiture statute.
January 6, 2010
The Honorable Pam Roach
Senator, District 31                                             Cite As:
PO Box 40431                                                     AGO 2010 No. 1
Olympia, WA 98504-0431
Dear Senator Roach:
By letter previously acknowledged, you have requested our opinion on a question we
have summarized and paraphrased as follows:
Can law enforcement agencies use state asset forfeiture funds' for
accreditation and/or reaccreditation fees and for the training that such
accreditation requires?
BRIEF ANSWER
Law enforcement agencies can use state asset forfeiture funds obtained under RCW
10.105.010 for accreditation, reaccreditation, and necessary associated training which serves to
improve law enforcement activity, provided that such funding does not supplant existing funding
sources. However, any accreditation, reaccreditation, or necessary associated training that does
not serve to improve or expand law enforcement activity would not be eligible for funding under
RCW 10.105.010. Furthermore, state asset forfeiture funds obtained by a law enforcement
' For the purposes of this opinion, we define state asset forfeiture funds to be those net proceeds lawfully
retained by a seizing law enforcement agency through forfeiture. Notably, net proceeds is defined slightly
differently under some of the different applicable statutes, as explained in footnote 5 below.
Attorney General of Washington
Post Office Box 40100
Olympia, WA 98504-0100
(360) 753-6200

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most