About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1998 Minnesota Attorney General Reports and Opinions 1 (1998)

handle is hein.sag/sagmn0038 and id is 1 raw text is: EDUCATION: INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT: BOND ELECTION: RE'VIEW              ND
COMMENT. Schoo. board which receives oetiton by voters to hold mneciad -ICtion1 to
authorize issuance oj bonds for school facilir must suomit project for review and comment. A
community recreationai facility as described by school district is subject to review and comment
procedures. Unless the review and comment is negative. school board must call the special
election petitioned by voters. Minn. Stat. § 121.148 (1996). 121.15 (Supp. 1997). 205A.05
(Supp. 1997). Affirmaive vote in bond election does not compel board to issue bonds.
Op. Arty. Gen. 159-a-3. May 25. 1970.
March 11, 1998
John M. Roszak. Esq.                                                       I 59-a-3
Jay T. Squires, Esq.                           (Cr. Ref. to 159-b-1. 622-a-I and 622-b)
Ratwik, Roszak, Maloney, P.A.
300 Peavey Bldg.
730 Second Ave. South
Minneapolis, MN 55402
Dear Messrs. Roszak and Squires:
In your letter to Attomev General Hubert H. Humphrey III you present substantially the
following:
FACTS
In October of 1997. Independent School District No. 197 (West St. Paul-
Mendota Heights-Eagan) was presented with a petition signed by voters of the
School District. The petition requests the Board of Education to authorize and
hold a special election for the school district in accordance with applicable and
current Minnesota State Statutes. The petition goes on to state:
The Special Election ballot will pose question(s) to District voters
authorizing the sale of bonds to finance the design, construction
and equipping of a multi-purpose activity center to be located at
the Henry Sibley High School campus. The activity center could
house facilities to serve all District resident and youth programs.
Previously. the School District had created a community task force to study various
proposals. including proposals that contemplated the erection of a community activity
center in the District. In September of 1996. the School Board determined. based on cost
considerations and the availability of existing space. that plans to erect a community
facility were not feasible.
As a resuit of receiving the petition for the special election. the administration of
the School District has attempted to determine the cost of architectural and design fees to
comply with Minn. Stat.   121.148 -e. if the District is required to do so prior to
conducting an election oursuant :o the petition. Although the matter is not without some
uncertaintv. the District has been advised that it co= 20st approximately S20.000 to
£:.~~~~ 00  o U':tes

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most