About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

38 W. New Eng. L. Rev. 1 (2016)

handle is hein.journals/wnelr38 and id is 1 raw text is: 



WESTERN NEW ENGLAND LAW REVIEW


Volume 38                      2016                      Issue 1



                             NOTES



    SECURITIES/ADMINISTRATIVE LAW                INTERNAL
REPORTERS WHO BLOW THE WHISTLE: ARE THEY PROTECTED
     UNDER THE DODD-FRANK ACT'S ANTI-RETALIATION
                          PROVISION?


                          Kristin Goodchild *


   In 2010, Congress enacted the Dodd-Frank Wall Street and
   Consumer Protection Act (the Dodd-Frank Act), which was
   a   sweeping   piece  of   legislation that  required  the
   implementation of new rules and regulations throughout the
   financial industry. Interpretative ambiguity exists within the
   Dodd-Frank Act's whistleblower program, which provides a
   definition of who qualifies as a whistleblower, and an anti-
   retaliation provision,  which   is  intended   to  protect
   whistleblowers from retaliation. The ambiguity arises because a
   whistleblower is defined as an individual who makes a report to
   the Securities and Exchange Commission       (the  SEC).
   However, the     anti-retaliation  provision  describes  three
   categories of protected whistleblowing activities, one of which
   can be construed as an exception to the whistleblower
   definition since it does not require disclosure to the SEC. The
   SEC sought to clarify this ambiguity by issuing a rule (the
   SEC's Rule) explaining that retaliation protection under the
   Dodd-Frank Act extends to an individual who only reports
   possible securities law  violations through his employer's
   internal whistleblowing procedures.

   The Second and Fifth Circuits and several district courts have
   weighed in. The Fifth Circuit and the minority of district courts
   have determined that there is no ambiguity and, according to
   the definition of whistleblower, an individual must report
   potential securities law violations to the SEC to receive
   retaliation protection. The Second Circuit and a majority of
   district courts have determined that there is ambiguity and the
   SEC's Rule is a reasonable interpretation that should be given
   deference in order to provide retaliation protection to an

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most