About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

7 Women's Suffrage J. 1 (1876)

handle is hein.journals/wmsuffpr7 and id is 1 raw text is: 






WOMEN'S SUFFRAGE JOURNAL.
                                           EDITED BY LYDIA E. BEOKER.

  VoL. vi.-No. 71. PUBLISHED MONTHLY.         JANUARY 1,   1876.                        PRICE ONE PENNY.
  REGISTERED FOR TRANSMISSION ABROAD.                                              BY POST THREE I-ALFPENCE.


THE   meeting of Parliament is fixed for February the 8th,
and  the New  Year's message with which we would greet
our  friends and  subscribers is an earnest exhortation
to  prepare for a vigorous campaign in support  of Mr.
FORSYTH's   Bill. All political associations are busy pre-
paring for the coming session, and if we would hold the
ground  we have won,  we must  not be behind the best of
them  in serious preparation and earnest work in support
of the efforts which our Parliamentary leaders make on
our behalf. Petition, petition, petition, must still be the
burden  of our cry; and we ask all who can  aid in this
essential manner  to send at once to  the office of this
Jowrnal,  when  they will be supplied with all necessary
.material and information.
   The last month  of the year that has just closed has
 been marked by a signal step in the political progress of
 the question. The  National Reform  Union  Conference
 recently held at Manchester, which represents the ad-
 vanced section of the Liberal party, has formally recog-
 nised the principle of the right of women citizens to vote
 in the election of Members of Parliament. In the original
 draft of resolutions prepared by the committee-to be sub-
 mitted to the Conference, the principle, though recognised,
 was not quite unmistakably promulgated. The principle
 the Conference was asked to adopt was  the equality of all
 citizens before the law, and this was understood to include
 women citizens. But, when definite resolutions came to
 be proposed, the scope of this declaration was made clear.
 The resolution respecting the reform of the representa-
 tive system recommended  as a  subject for immediate
 legislation c: the extension of household suffrage to
 counties. Miss  STURGE,  who  appeared  at the Con-
 ference as a delegate from the Women's   Liberal As-
 sociation of Birmingham, moved as ar  amendment  the
 extension of the suffrage to all householders in counties,
 with the intention of including women householders, and
 in this sense the amendment  was carried by an  over-
whelming  majority, and afterwards unanimously adopted
as a substantive resolution.
  The  significance of this resolution may be estimated
from  the fact that the Conference consisted of several


hundred   delegates representing 173 Liberal Associations
in  128 towns, and  that this great representative body
found  it impossible to resist the logic of the claim of women
citizens, householders, and ratepayers, for the electoral
privileges which the household and ratepayer's qualification
confers on  men.  The Women's  Suffrage Associations, as
such  were, of course, not represented at the Conference.
They  exist for the sole object of obtaining for women who
are otherwise legally qualified, the right of voting in the
election of Members of Parliament. Their platform is not
a party one, and they could not appear at any gathering
convened  for party purposes. But though  the Women's
Suffrage Societies are of no party, their principle is one
which  commends  itself to both parties. It recognises the
necessity for the further enfranchisement of the people,
and  is therefore Liberal. But it seeks this extension of
enfranchisement strictly on the  ancient lines of the
Constitution, and is therefore Conservative.
   In the evening, after the Reform Union Conference, a
public meeting was  held in the Free Trade Hall, under
the  presidency of Mr. JACOB BRIGHT,  when  resolutions
were  passed approving of the proceedings of the Con-
ference, and accepting them as the basis of future action.
In proposing the first resolution, Mr. W. S. CAINE pointed
out  the amendment   introduced by Miss  STURGE,  and
explained that it committed the meeting to the principle
of giving votes to all householders, both male and female,
adding that he was glad the Conference had adopted the
resolution as amended,  unanimously.   Afterwards, in
supporting a vote of thanks to the Chairman, Miss STURGE
explained that the same principle had been adopted three
years ago by the Reform Association of Birmingham, on
a resolution proposed by Mr. JOSEPH CHAMBERLAkIN, now
their worthy Mayor.  Mr. JACOB  BRIGHT, in responding
to the vote of thanks, said that if he were in the House
of Commons   again he would  give his attention to the
weakest  in the community,  whether   the agricultural
labourer or those who had been so ably represented by
MiS3 STURGE  that evening. If he was in the position at
all of a representative of these, he gloried in his clients
they did not do him any disgrace. If they should come

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most