About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

99 Wash. L. Rev. Online 1 (2024-2025)

handle is hein.journals/wlro99 and id is 1 raw text is: BREAKING ALGORITHMIC IMMUNITY: WHY SECTION 230 IMMUNITY MAY NOT EXTEND TO RECOMMENDATION ALGORITHMS Max Del Real* Abstract: In the mid-1990s, internet experiences were underwhelming by today's standards, despite the breakthrough technologies at their core. When a person logged on to the internet, they were met with a static experience. No matter who you were, where you were, or how you accessed a particular website, it rendered a consistent page. Today, internet experiences are personalized, dynamic, and vast-a far cry from the digital landscape of just a few decades ago. While today's internet is unrecognizable compared with its early predecessors, many of its governing laws remain materially unaltered. In particular, section 230 of the Communications Act, which passed in 1996, remains a critical element of the bedrock upon which the internet has flourished. While the words of section 230's primary provisions remain unchanged, courts' applications have somewhat modernized to keep pace with technology. However, recommendation algorithms pose an especially tricky challenge for section 230 analyses. Initially, courts extended section 230 immunity to internet platforms for algorithmic recommendations of third-party information, but a growing cohort of circuit judges are questioning whether that treatment stretches the statute too far. Although the United States Supreme Court had an opportunity to weigh in through Gonzalez v. Google, that case's disposition ultimately left the issue open. This Comment dives deep into the current section 230 doctrine and examines its application to recommendation algorithms. While multiple theories have emerged that could successfully limit section 230 immunity's reach to recommendation algorithms, each will have distinct implications for the future of consumer technology. Regardless, there are multiple strategies that can feasibly negate section 230 immunity when the defendant has used recommendation algorithms. INTRODUCTION Since its passage in 1996, section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (section 230) has shielded internet companies from liability in myriad cases. Although rooted in defamation law, defendants have successfully wielded section 230 in suits far afield from its origins. The statute's wide reach is commonly credited as a critical factor in the rapid *J.D. Candidate, University of Washington School of Law, Class of 2024; B.S. 2011, M.S. 2012, Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University. Thank you to Professor Eric Schnapper and members of the University of Washington Tech Policy Lab for discussions that helped develop this topic. Thank you also to the Washington Law Review Online editors for the incredibly helpful feedback throughout the process. 1

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most