About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

58 J. Offender Rehab. 1 (2019)

handle is hein.journals/wjor58 and id is 1 raw text is: 



JOURNAL OF OFFENDER REHABILITATION
2019, VOL. 58, NO. 1, 1-29
https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2018.1549181


Routledge
Taylor& Francis Group


Pausing in the wake of rapid adoption: A call to
critically   examine the veterans treatment court concept


Julie Marie Baldwina   and Erika J. Brookeb

aMissouri State University, Springfield, Missouri, USA; bUniversity of Florida, Gainesville,
Florida, USA


   ABSTRACT                                                     KEYWORDS
   Veterans treatment courts (VTCs) are  currently the fastest  veterans treatment court;
   growing specialized court in the United States. In the wake of veterans court; offender
   this rapid dissemination, the field has begun to empirically rehabilitation; specialized
   research VTCs  but has acknowledged   that little is known   jusil
   about them. While initial examinations of VTC program struc-
   ture, operation, and outcomes have been conducted, the con-
   cept itself has yet to be critically examined to date. Therefore,
   this work calls attention to the need for critical discussions
   and  evaluations of the VC   concept  itself, specifically its
   underlying assumptions and  ongoing policies and practices.
   To begin this inquiry, we first discern several assumptions on
   which the VIC  concept exists and then analyze the related
   discourse and criticism available to assess the validity and
   potential effects of these assumptions. Next, several VTC poli-
   cies and practices that are based in these assumptions and
   have  the potential to be discriminatory are identified, and
   their current implementation and effects are investigated. A
   discussion of the identified assumptions and practices congru-
   ity with punishment  philosophies ensues. Finally, state of
   empirical knowledge   on  VICs  is reviewed, revealing its
   infancy. The conclusion highlights key elements discovered in
   this work and presents corresponding recommendations  and
   guidance for future consideration and research.





Introduction

The  veterans   treatment   court  (VTC)   concept   has become the fastest grow-
ing  specialized  court  program this century, reaching an overall dissemin-
ation   level  second   only   to  that  of  drug   courts   (Baldwin & Drapela,
Forthcoming). With the concept emerging in 2004 (see Smith, 2012) and a
publicized  model   in  2009  (see Russell, 2009),  the  concept  has  been  adopted
by  jurisdictions across  the majority   of states (Justice for Vets,  nd.a,  b) dur-
ing  the  last decade.  As   of June   2016,  more   than  450   veterans  treatment
courts   (VTCs), veteran dockets, and veteran tracks (Flatley, Clark,


CONTACT Julie M. Baldwin 0 baldwin.juliemarie@gmail.com ( Department of Criminology & Criminal Justice,
Missouri State University, Strong Hall 226, 901 5. National Avenue, Springfield, MO 65897, USA.
CO 2019 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most