About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

1 U.S. Weekly L.J. 1 (1933)

handle is hein.journals/usdlj1 and id is 1 raw text is: LAW JOURNAL Complete Text of Decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States Current Law: Federal and State Published by The United States Daily Publishing Corporation. $25 a year. Application for entry as second-class matter pendrng atg washington. Vol. I. No. 1. WASHINGTON, MARCH 14, 1933 INDEX 1 PAGE Announcement Beginning today The United States Daily issues a weekly Law Journal which will include every Tuesday morning the full text of all decisions handed down by the Supreme Court of the United States and digests of current decisions of Federal and State courts generally. We are sending today's issue to all lawyers who are subscribers to The United States Daily and we will be glad to send copies in the future to any other subscribers of The United States Daily who request the Law Journal in fulfillment of their present subscriptions to The United States Daily. Another weekly publication recording the activities of the Legislative and Executive branches of the Government is being planned and when issued will be sent to all subscribers of The United States Daily. Issues of the Law Journal will include comprehensive, digests of recent significant opinions of other Federal courts and of the highest State courts, in addition to the complete text of all opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States. The weekly Law Journal will also report happenings and events of importance primarily to the legal profession, including digests of important tax cases. Topical indexes to the opinions of the Supreme Court and to the digests of opinions of other courts will be published periodically. Complete Text of Opinions Announced March 13, 1933 By the Supreme Court of the United States Opinions Announced at Prior Sessions of Present Term Appeared in Weekly Supplements to The United States Daily 1 Cumulative Table of Cases and Topical Index to Such Opinions Were Published in Supplement of Feb. 14 J I Table of Cases I Index Page Anderson. Collector, etc. v. Wilson et al., Exec., etc ................................ 8 Appalachian Coals, Inc., et al. v. United States .................................... 29 Arthur C. Harvey Co. v. O'Malley et al .... 20 Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co. et al. v. Brady.. 23 Bemis Bros. Bag Co. v. United States ..... 9 Burnet, Com'r., etc. v. A. T. Jergins Trust.. 4 Burnet, Com'r., etc. v. Brooks et al ....... 33 Burnet, Com'r., etc. v. S. & L. Building C orp . ..................................... 17 Central Transfer Co. v. Terminal Railroad Ass'n of St. Louis et al ................. 21 Clark v. United States ...................... 1 Harvey Co. v. Halley et al ................ 20 Helner, Collector, etc. v. Diamond Alkali Co. 11 Lewellyn, formerly Collector, etc. v. Dia- m ond Alkali Co. ......................... 11 The official Journal of the proceedings of the Supreme Court Appears on Index Page 49. Index Page Liggett Co. et al. v. Lee, Comptroller, etc., et al . ..................................... 38 McDonnell v. United States ............... 18 Munroe, Rec. v. Raphael .................. 12 Pacific Coast Steel Co. v. McLaughlin ..... 19 Petroleum Exploration v. Burnet, Com'r., etc . ....................................... 20 Porter, Exec., etc. v. Com'r. Int. Rev ...... 26 Puerto Rico v. Russell & Co., Sucrs., etc... 24 Spicer, etc. v. Smith, Spec. Deputy Bank- ing Com'r., etc ......................... 28 Truda v. United States .................... 18 United States v. Dakota-Montana Oil Co. .. 15 United States et al. v. Northern Pacific Ry. C o. et al . ................................. 13 Vancouver Steamship Co., Ltd. v. Rice, Adm ., etc . ................................ 23 Williams, Rec., etc. v. Mayor and City Coun- cil of Baltimore et al ..................... 5 Wilson et al., Exec., etc. v, Anderson, Col- lector, etc . ............................... 8 GENEVIEVE A. CLARK V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Supreme Court of the United States. No. 531. Decided March 13, 1933. On writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. SIGURD UELAND for petitioner; WHITNEY NORTH SEYMOUR (THOMAS D. THACHER, Solicitor General, NUGENT DODDS, As- sistant Attorney General, NEIL BURKIN- SHAW, W. MARVIN SMITH, WILLIAM H. RILEY Ja., and WALTER GELLHORN with him on the brief), for respondent. Contempt- Criminal contempt- Obstruc- tion of justice-Prospective juror's con- cealment and misstatement on voir dire examination-Effect of perjury- A prospective juror in a criminal case who when asked on voir dire examination to state the kinds of work that she had been doing counted off a few and checked herself at the very point where the count if completed would be likely to bar her from the jury without excuse of oversight 07he (3-n1*t.Cb $fatco Pai*tso'

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most