About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

2023 U. Ill. L. Rev. Online 1 (2023)

handle is hein.journals/uilro2023 and id is 1 raw text is: 












SURPRISINGLY (UN)INSPIRING JUDICIAL

DECISIONS


                                                      Brian Christopher   Jones*


                                 INTRODUCTION

      Supreme   Court   decisions  can  quickly   and  dramatically  change   the
constitutional landscape.  They  may  provide  rights or protections where  none
previously  existed, help delineate the separation of powers, or even contain the
final blow  to a faltering presidency.  But  can they  affect voter turnout? The
consensus  among   commentators   and pollsters was that Dobbs   would  galvanize
voters toward  the ballot box in November 2022,2 and indeed there were signs
that overturning Roe  had  invigorated voters in some  places.3 But  even though
Democrats   did  better than predicted  in the midterms,  the  post-Dobbs   effect
ultimately aligned with a familiar pattern to other landmark SCOTUS decisions:
that of decreasing post-decision voter turnout. The  2018 elections produced  the
strongest midterm   voter turnout in over a century  (50%), but the 2022  returns
show   that voter turnout fell to 46.8%,   down  over  three points  from  2018.4
Scouring   years of  voter turnout  data, this piece  finds that landmark   court
decisions-in   the US   and  elsewhere-do not often result in increased voter
turnout. Many   landmark   cases have  been  surprisingly followed  by decreased
voter turnout or by  very marginal  voter turnout increases, suggesting that they
often placate rather than energize the electorate.



    *   Lecturer (Asst. Prof.) in Law, School of Law, University of Sheffield. Special thanks to the Illinois
Law Review staff for all its diligent work on this piece. Any errors remain mine.
    1.  Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, No. 19-1392, 597 U.S. ___ (2022).
    2.  Tom Bonier, Women Are So Fired Up to Vote, I've Never Seen Anything Like It, N.Y. TIMES (Sept. 3,
2022),          https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/03/opinion/women-voters-roe-abortion-midterms.html
[https://perma.ccIW7VM-HRDD]; See also Catherine Lucey, Support for Legalized Abortion Grows Since
Dobbs Ruling, WSJ Poll Shows, WALL ST. J. (Sept. 3, 2022, 9:00 AM), https://www.wsj.com/articles/support-
for-legalized-abortion-grows-since-dobbs-ruling-wsj-poll-shows-11662210020 [https://perma.cc/TBF2-JAAP].
    3.  Gabriella Borter, Kansas Votes to Preserve Abortion Rights in First Post-Roe v. Wade Election Test,
REUTERS (Aug. 4, 2022, 3:50 AM), https://www.reuters.com/world/us/abortion-rights-face-voter-test-kansas-
after-roe-v-wade-reversal-2022-08-02/ [https://perma.cc/T5W3-PCCW].
    4.  National General Election VEP Turnout Rates, 1789-Present, U.S. Election Project,
https://www.electproject.org/2022g, (last visited Jan. 6, 2022) [https://perma.cc/88DL-B2MH]. However, note
that the 2022 voter turnout was still quite high in comparative perspective, and was the highest midterm turnout
since 1970 (473%).


1

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most