About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

49 Stetson L. Rev. i (2019-2020)

handle is hein.journals/stet49 and id is 1 raw text is: STETSON LAw REVIEW VOLUME 49 FALL 2019 NUMBER 1 OPEN ISSUE ARTICLES Say What?: A How-To Guide on Providing Formative Assessment to Law Students Through Live Critique Amana L. Sholtis 1 The American Bar Association requires law schools to move beyond the traditional, single final exam and incorporate more assessment One method of assessment law professors may want to use is live critique. Through live critique, the professor examines students' work for the first time in front of students and reacts to it live. This article details the benefits of live critique for law students, which include enhanced learning, increased confidence, and practice-ready skills. It also describes how professors can boost the effectiveness and efficiency of their feedback by delivering it live. Finally, the article provides suggestions for professors in overcoming potential challenges and provides step-by-step guidance on how to integrate live critique into any law school course. PASPA's Got a Brand New Bag: President Trump's States' Rights Bias For Gambling Calls the Winning Walter T. Champion 39 Hand Sports gambling is inherently a states' rights issue, as recognized by the United States Supreme Court in recent pivotal cases, such as the 2018 seminal case, Murphy v. NCAA. In Murphy, the Court found that a provision in Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA), a federal law regulating state sports gambling that restricted a state's ability to repeal its own sports betting legislation unconstitutionally commandeered state legislatures. Following this 2018 ruling and the addition of President Trump appointed justices, the Court has consistently reaffirmed state's rights, from employment contracts to sports gambling. As states, voters, and sports organizations, like the NCAA and the NFL, push to legalize sports betting, especially with the rise of Daily Fantasy Sports, more legal challenges to PASPA will inevitably arise. So, with President Trump's states' rights bias and its reflection in his appointments to the Supreme Court, the end of PASPA is near and states' rights will ultimately win. The Fallacy of A Prior Statism Alan G. Futerman & Walter E. Block 73 For statists, the government is not only conceptualized independently of and/or before experience, but also apart from experience, or a priori. When problems are not solved through the state, then more government intervention is logically required, because it is understood by statists as the solution. Since the state is not blamed for the failures (because it is said to be the solution for the failures], statism results in a logical fallacy. We intend to present and refute such fallacy in the present work.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most