About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

23 Soc. & Legal Stud. 3 (2014)

handle is hein.journals/solestu23 and id is 1 raw text is: 





Article
                                                                 Social & Legal Studies
                                                                 2014, Vol. 23(I) 3-29
     'Special' Delivery?                                        c The Author(s) 2013
                                                               Reprints and permission:
                                                      sagepub.co.uljournalsPermissions .na
Exploring          the     Im   pact                     DOI: 10.117710964663913496676
                                                                    sls sagepub corn
of Screens, Live-Links                                                 *sGE

and Video-Recorded

Evidence on Mock

Juror Deliberation

in Rape Trials



Louise Ellison
University of Leeds, UK

Vanessa E Munro
University of Nottingham, UK



Abstract
This article discusses the findings of a study in which 160 volunteer members of the public
observed one of four mini rape trial reconstructions and were asked to deliberate as a
group towards a verdict. In a context in which research into the substantive content of the
deliberations of real jurors is prohibited by the Contempt of Court Act 1981, these dis-
cussions were analysed to assess whether, and in what ways, perceptions of adult rape
testimony are influenced by different modes of presentation. While lawyers and other
observers have speculated about the possible undue effects of alternative trial arrange-
ments on juror perceptions and the evaluation of evidence in rape trials, the issue has
received scant empirical attention. In an effort to bridge this knowledge gap, this study
investigated the influence upon mock jurors of three special measures currently made
available in England and Wales to adult sexual offence complainants by the Youth Justice and
Criminal Evidence Act 1999, namely (I) live-links; (2) video-recorded evidence-in-chief
followed by live-link cross-examination and (3) protective screens. Following a careful and
contextual exploration of the content of the mock juries' deliberations, the researchers


Corresponding author:
Vanessa E Munro, School of Law, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK.
Email: vanessa.munro@nottingham.ac.uk

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most