About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

123 Colum. L. Rev. Forum 1 (2023)

handle is hein.journals/sidbarc123 and id is 1 raw text is: 








             COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW FORUM

VOL. 123                      JANUARY   27, 2023                  PAGES  1-36


          ANTITRUST INTEROPERABILITY REMEDIES

                            Herbert Hovenkamp*


          Compelled  interoperability can be a useful judicial or statutory
     remedy for dominant firms, including digital platforms with significant
     market power  in a product or service. They can address competition
     concerns without interfering unnecessarily with the structures that make
     digital platforms attractive and that have  contributed so much  to
     economic growth.
          Given the wide variety of structures and business models for big tech,
     interoperability must be defined flexibly. Approaches to interoperability
     begin with the premise that anything that can be organized within afirm
     can also be organized in a market, and vice versa. The key to a good
     interoperability solution is to permit individual assets to function
     competitively where that is preferable but collaboratively when colla-
     boration produces better results. Interoperability can include everything
     from dynamic interoperability, which requires real-time sharing of data
     and operations, to static interoperability which requires portability but
     not necessarily real-time interactions.
          Interoperability is not the best remedy in all situations, nor even for
     all of those that involve digital platforms. For example, it is rarely the best
     remedy for nondominant   assets, even those that are sold on two-sided
     digital markets.
          Tested by these criteria, the proposed American Innovation and
     Choice  Online Act  falls short. Without assessing a  market power
     requirement, it would compel  interoperability of ordinary competitive
     products, and in ways that are likely to produce significant private and
     enforcement costs and  to encourage  substantial free riding without
     offering any competitive benefit.

                               INTRODUCTION

     Today  the  antitrust press focuses heavily  on  the practices of large
digital companies.   The  firms  that have  evoked  so  much   attention are



     * James G. Dinan University Professor, University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School and
the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. Thanks to Erik Hovenkamp and Fiona
M. Scott Morton for comments and Alezeh Rauf and Molly Zhang for research assistance.


1

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most