About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

13 SCRIPTed 1 (2016)

handle is hein.journals/scripted13 and id is 1 raw text is: 










                        Volume 13, Issue 1, May 2016



 Comparative Case Studies in Implementing Net Neutrality:
                 A Critical Analysis of Zero Rating

                            Christopher T. Marsden

Abstract

This article critically examines the relatively few  examples of regulatory
implementation of network neutrality enforcement at national level. It draws on co-
regulatory and   self-regulatory theories of implementation and capture, and
interdisciplinary studies into the real-world effect of regulatory threats to traffic
management practices (TMP). Most academic and policy literature on net neutrality
regulation has focussed on legislative proposals and economic or technological
principles, rather than specific examples of comparative national implementation. This
is in part due to the relatively few case studies of effective implementation of
legislation. The article presents the results of fieldwork in South America, North
America and Europe over an extended period (2003-2015). The countries studied are:
Brazil, India, Chile, Norway, Netherlands, Slovenia, Canada, United States, and those
within the European Union. Empirical interviews were conducted in-field with
regulators, government officials, ISPs, content providers, academic experts, NGOs and
other stakeholders from Chile, Brazil, United States, India, Canada, United Kingdom,
Netherlands, Slovenia, Norway. It also explores the opaque practices of co-regulatory
forums where governments or regulators have decided on partial private rather than
public diplomacy with ISPs, notably in the US, Norway and UK. The article notes the
limited political and administrative commitment to effective regulation thus far, and
draws on that critical analysis to propose reasons for failure to implement effective
regulation. Finally, it compares results of implementations and proposes a framework
for a regulatory toolkit. The specific issue considered are the tolerance of zero rating
practices, notably as deployed by mobile ISPs.


                          DOI: 10.2966/scrip. 130116.1


0            © Christopher T. Marsden 2016. This work is licensed under a Creative
Commons Licence. Please click on the link to read the terms and conditions.


Professor, University of Sussex School of Law, Sussex, United Kingdom.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most