About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

21 Refuge 2 (2002-2003)

handle is hein.journals/rfgcjr21 and id is 1 raw text is: Introduction Population Displacements: Causes and Consequences OGENGA OTUNNU While the international community is frantically engaged in developing more credible terror poli- cies against refugees and immigrants and is feve- rishly occupied with the politics of the U.S.-led war on terrorism, over thirty million internally displaced people endure persecutions and remain caged in turbulent and inhumane conditions in their home countries. Some fifteen million externally displaced persons or refugees also lan- guish outside their home countries without basic human rights and human security. These victims of violations of human rights and political violence are uprooted from their homes by a number of interrelated factors, internal and external, past and present. Historically, mass displacements of populations have been intimately linked with violently contested legitimacy of the state, its institutions, and their incumbents. Legitimacy of the state demands that the construction and/or the preservation of the political entity reflect the vital interests, values, and expectations of its members. Human rights, including the rights to development, human security, and social justice, are central to the political legitimacy of the state and its institu- tions. When a state meets these criteria, its members, in turn, will identify and co-operate with it and its institutions. Such a state, whose sovereignty is derived from its members, is also likely to conform to international norms, customs, principles, conventions, and obligations by which relations between sta- tes and international persons are governed. States that are major sources of contemporary displace- ments of populations, however, suffer from a profound and chronic legitimation deficit. The origins of this pervasive and harrowing crisis of legitimacy reflect how these preda- tory juridical states were constructed and preserved. In Africa, Asia, the Middle East, and Latin America, these states were constructed to meet the vaulting socio-econo- mic, strategic and political interests of imperial powers. Since the primary motives for imperialism did not conform to the interests, values, and expectations of the conquered and dehumanized inhabitants of the colonial creations, the states experienced profound crises of legitimacy. These states also became important sites of violations of human rights and political violence, including terror. The profound legitimation deficit of the state and its incumbents was exacerbated by the imperial violence that accompanied colonial state formations. This violence in- cluded herding the target populations into concentration camps, scorched-earth policies, patronage, and manipula- tion of nationality and/or religious contradictions. Many lives were lost and many inhabitants of the colonial territo- ries were violently uprooted as well. The notoriously arbitrary boundaries of these states in- tensified the crisis of legitimacy of the faltering colonial states. Paper boundaries, which were imposed on these societies, often cut across national, cultural, linguistic, and economic entities. For example, in the Middle East, the Kurds and the Palestinians were displaced and left stranded in many neighbouring countries. Similarly, in Africa, the Akan, Ewe, Yuruba, Hutu, Tutsi, and Somalis, for example, found themselves in a number of colonial states. The im- posed and hostile boundaries, compounded by colonial administrative and economic policies, also left some of the states so small or immense in area or population that they were not viable entities. Although during anti-colonial struggles some local poli- tical leaders had criticized the artificial nature of the boun- daries, as soon as they assumed power they defended the boundaries. Where national groups demanded self-deter- mination, the new rulers used the same institutions and agents of terror to suppress such demands. The politics of © Ogenga Otunnu, 2002. This open-access work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits use, reproduction and distribution in any medium for non-commercial purposes, provided the original author(s) are credited and the original publication in Refuge: Canada's Journal on Refugees is cited.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most