About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

23 Res Publica 1 (2017)

handle is hein.journals/respub23 and id is 1 raw text is: Res Publica (2017) 23:1-22
DOI 10.1007/s11158-015-9294-x                                        CrossMark
The Gauthier Contract: Applicable or Not?
Jeremy Neill'
Published online: 27 October 2015
© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015
Abstract In a 2013 article, David Gauthier noted upon the twenty-fifth anniver-
sary of the publication of Morals by Agreement that his contractarian approach to
morality had found a niche among 'some of those who remain unpersuaded by
either Kantianism or utilitarianism'. In this article I will focus on Pareto opti-
mization and I will argue that the Gauthier contract, even in spite of the article's
revisions, is still less useful for consultation purposes than Gauthier is assuming. To
highlight the conceptual distance that I think separates the Gauthier contract from
real-world circumstances-a separation that is greater than Gauthier supposes-I
will focus on the problem of 'civic defection'. The point is not for us to repudiate as
such the deliverances of the Gauthier model, but simply to use caution in our
deployment of the model, and, in order to access the full extent of the model's
offerings, to resist the temptation to deploy it in the service of purposes which it is
not capable of accomplishing.
Keywords Gauthier - Ethics - Rational choice - Contract - Ideal theory
Introduction
In his 2013 Ethics article, David Gauthier noted upon the twenty-fifth anniversary of
Morals by Agreement that his contractarian approach to morality had found a niche
among 'some of those who remain unpersuaded by either Kantianism or utilitarian-
ism', and he updated that approach by substituting 'Pareto optimization' for Morals by
Agreement's 'constrained maximization', and likewise 'maximin relative benefit' for
'maximin proportionate gain' (Gauthier 2013, pp. 601-624). In this article I will focus
® Jeremy Neill
jneill@hbu.edu
Department of Philosophy, Houston Baptist University, Houston, TX 77074, USA

I_ Springer

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most