About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

61 Prob. J. 3 (2014)

handle is hein.journals/probj61 and id is 1 raw text is: 




Editorial                                                The -l fI oCo ,y aid c hs

                                                                    Probation Journal
The Probation                                                    24o
                                                              Reprints and permissions:
Institute: M           ore      than                 sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav
                                                      DOI: 10.1177/0264550514522578
an     afterthought?                                                prb sagepub cor
                                                                      OSAGE





The establishment of the Probation Institute has been an interesting by-product of the
Transforming Rehabilitation agenda. The Institute is a joint venture between the Pro-
bation Chiefs Association (PCA), the Probation Association (PA), Napo and Unison,
working  with the Ministry of Justice to 'provide a framework for unifying the pro-
bation workforce as a whole  by providing professional leadership' (The Probation
Institute, 2013: 3). According to its prospectus, the Institute would be:

   ... an independent, not-for-profit Company Limited by Guarantee, aiming to become
   a recognised centre of excellence on probation practice, applying rigorous standards
   to the assessment of research and other evidence and its implications for the delivery of
   services that protect the public and rehabilitate offenders. (p. 3)

   It could be argued that those representing probation's interests have at times
failed to speak with one voice and in this respect the Institute is a welcome devel-
opment  although it will undoubtedly face significant challenges if it is to achieve its
ambitions. Not least amongst these is the fact that the Institute is being established
within a political environment that seeks to increase competition and achieve sig-
nificant cost savings. Frances Crook has observed that: 'Perhaps the real regret is
that it has taken the Transforming Rehabilitation reforms to see this Institute being set
up, with the unavoidable sense that it is an afterthought to the primary goal of pri-
vatising the probation service' (Crook, 2013).
   As membership  of the Institute is voluntary it will rely on the cooperation of those
involved and that they will 'do the right thing'. However market conditions, and the
pursuit of profit, might militate against this and undermine reciprocity and trust.
Membership   will be open to individuals, small charitable organizations and large
corporations involved in the delivery of rehabilitative services. It is envisaged that
one of its initial tasks will be to articulate 'the values of the Institute and the code of
conduct expected' (p. 12). This will be no easy task given the myriad of providers it
is envisaged will be involved in delivering the Transforming Rehabilitation agenda
at both the prime  and sub-prime  level. Amongst those organizations who   have
cleared the Pre-Qualification Questionnaire (PQQ) stage are a mix of large private
companies  (15), probation mutuals (11), voluntary organizations (10), County and

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most