About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

11 Panel 1 (1933)

handle is hein.journals/panelmbu11 and id is 1 raw text is: To increase the efficiency of the Grand Jury System

hI

PANEL

A Publication Devoted to the Exchange of Views of Public Oficials and Citizens in the Effort to Prevent Crime
and Secure the True Administration of Justice
PUBLISHED BY THE
ASSOCIATION OF GRAND JURORS OF NEW YORK COUNTY
The contributions and letters in The Panel are either credited to their authors or signed with the names or initials of their
writers and the Editor assumes no responsibility for the opinions contained therein beyond expressing the views that the
subjects they treat of are worthy of the attention of Grand Jurors.
VOL. 11                                       JANUARY-FEBRUARY, 1933                                                    NO. 1
GEORGIA GRAND JURIES CHECK ON PUBLIC OFFICIALS AND FUNDS
By BRYAN CUMMING
Augusta, Ga., Bar; Georgia State Bar; American Bar Association

Those who have been led to believe by
Prof. Raymond Moley and others that the
Grand Jury system is an outworn, out-
moded, expensive and useless survival in
criminal procedure in the United States
will be astonished to learn from the fol-
lowing article what a vital force the Grand
Jury has been made in Georgia and could
be made in every State of the Union.
This surprising article reveals that
Georgia already has as a regular and ac-
tively functioning institution the Audit-
ing Grand Jury suggested for Greater
New York City and other New York
State units by Lloyd N. Scott, of the
Association of the Bar of the City of New
York, in the May-June, 1931, issue of THE
PANEL which attracted wide attention.
As Mr. Bryan Cumming, a graduate of
Yale University and a leading lawyer of
Georgia, residing in Augusta, describes
the system, the Grand Jury in a Georgia
county today is the Grand Inquisition
it was in the early days of English law,
and more. It not only returns indictments
and hands up presentments, but by law it
has the duty of checking on public officials
and funds, on voting lists, on tax assess-
nents, on money borrowed for schools,
and on private as well as public places for
the confinement of offenders, of the ill or
the insane, but it issues lists for the selec-
tion of notaries and, in some cases, it
may decide when local or general legisla-
tion shall go into effect in the county.
Where the Georgia Grand Jury can not
punish wrongdoers by criminal processes
it can often crush them by the pitiless
publicity it is able to provide by its
reports.
This article is one of the most informa-
tive and constructive ever published in
THE PANEL.
Those who advocate the exercise by Grand
Juries of more extensive functions than the
mere finding of indictments, or special pre-
sentments in criminal matters, will find it
interesting to consider the powers, duties,
and obligations exercised and imposed by
and upon Grand Juries in the State of
Georgia.
Some question the usefulness of the Grand
Jury and even urge that this ancient arm
of the law be abolished. They think that

money and time would be saved by adopting
other methods. The Grand Jury, however,
serves a useful purpose for which it would
be difficult to find an adequate substitute.
It is the official inquisitorial body of the com-
munity. It can be and is, in Georgia, effective
in inspiring a high standard of action, and is
a constant deterrent to negligent, even if
not criminal, official conduct. While its in-
vestigations may not be as thorough and
complete as an investigation made by ex-
perts, the findings and recommendations of
THANKS FOR CONTRI-
BUTIONS
The Association of Grand Jurors of
New York County is keenly appre-
ciative of the contributions for the
support of THE PANEL resulting from
the appeal mailed with November-
December, 1932, issue.
Another appeal is hereby made to
those who forgot.
THE PANEL is the only magazine in
the United States devoted to improve-
ment of the criminal law. It is volun-
tarily supported and must have further
contributions if its useful and nation-
wide work is to continue.
this body of experienced, intelligent and up-
right persons serve as a foundation for
other and more searching investigations, if
the conditions reported upon in the first
instance by the Grand Jury would seem to
so require.
In the State of Georgia the County Grand
Jurors, who are selected from male citizens
most experienced, intelligent and upright,
are sworn to diligently inquire and true pre-
sentments make of all matters that shall be
given to them or come to their knowledge.
These shall include any violations of law
1

which they may know to have been com-
mitted at any time.
Inspects County Accounts
The Grand Jury thus selected and sworn
exercises the familiar and ancient power
and duty to indict, or to specially present,
persons accused of crime. This duty, how-
ever, occupies only a part of the Grand
Jury's time, and covers only one of its
many divers duties under the system in
Georgia.
It is the special duty of the Grand Jury
to inspect and examine offices, papers, books
and records of the Clerks of the Superior
Court and of the Ordinary, (The Ordinary
is the judicial officer in Georgia having juris-
diction over matters of probate and county
matters, except where superseded in the
latter instance by County Commissioners);
also the books, papers, records, documents
and vouchers of the County Treasurer.
The Grand Jurors shall carefully inspect
the sanitary condition of jails and make
presentment thereof, and also the treatment
of the inmates, and make recommendations
which the proper county authorities must
carry into effect and strictly enforce.
They are required to inspect all the pub-
lic buildings and other property of the
County, and the County records. If the re-
port shows that the County officials have
failed to comply with the law in reference
to such property it shall be the duty of the
Solicitor General (corresponding to the Dis-
trict Attorney in New York State) to com-
mence proceedings against the delinquent in
order to compel that officer to comply with
the law.
May Appoint Outside Examiners
The Grand Jury may, if it deem neces-
sary, appoint one or more citizens to inspect
and examine during vacation the office,
papers, books, accounts and vouchers of the
Ordinary, Clerk of the Superior Court,
County Treasurer, Tax Collector, Receiver
(Continued on page 4)

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most