About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

78 Ohio St. L.J. Sixth Cir. Rev. 13 (2017)

handle is hein.journals/osljsxcr78 and id is 1 raw text is: 






OHIO STATE LA WJOURNAL FURTHERMORE


                    SIXTH CIRCUIT  REVIEW

   A  Growing Consensus: A Comment on United
 States  v. Carpenter,   and  the  U.S.  Supreme Court's
            Opportunity to Protect Privacy

                       AARON  STEVENSON*

   Commenting on United States. v. Carpenter, 819 F.3d 880 (6th Cir. 2016).

                       TABLE OF CONTENTS

I.   INTRODUCTION                     ..........................................13
II.  THE CASE ITSELF-A  LOOK  AT UNITED STATES V. CARPENTER AND
     SIMILAR DECISIONS      ............................... ........15
     A. The Facts of the Case                 ...................... 15
     B. The Court's Decision and the Legal Ground on Which It
        Stands..............         .................. ..... 17
     C. Comparing  the Decision to Other CSLI Cases..... .....20
III. EXAMINING  THE IMPACT OF THE DECISION MOVING FORWARD  ... .22
     A. The Decision's Effects on Daily Privacy ..... .........22
     B. Unanswered Questions-What  the Sixth Circuit Didn't Say ...23
        1. Non-Phone  Call Generated CSLI..........     ......23
        2. More  Precise CSLI Cases       ........    .............25
        3.  GPS Third Party Business Records   ...............26
        4. Mass Amounts  ofInformation......................27
     C. The Supreme Court's Opportunity to Protect Privacy .....27
IV.  CONCLUSION.        ...........................................28

                        I. INTRODUCTION

   Be  aware-if you are a resident of Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky, or
Tennessee, the police can now obtain a record of your physical location without
a court-issued warrant.I For cell phone owners in these states-which is nearly


    * J.D. Candidate 2017, The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law; B.A., The
Ohio State University. The Author would like to thank Professor Ric Simmons and the Ohio
State Law Journal for their advice and feedback on this Comment.
    I See United States v. Carpenter, 819 F.3d 880, 886-90 (6th Cir. 2016).


Vol. 781


13

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most