About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

77 Ohio St. L.J. Sixth Cir. Rev. 15 (2016)

handle is hein.journals/osljsxcr77 and id is 1 raw text is: 






OHIO STATE LAW JO URNAL FURTHERMORE


                    SIXTH  CIRCUIT  REVIEW

 Outsourcing the Jury: Bartlett v. DuPont' and the
   Role  of Alternative Adjudication in Preserving
   Jury Fairness in Complex Scientific Litigation

                      ELIZABETH V. YOUNG*

   Commenting on Bartlett v. E. L du Pont de Nemours & Co., No. 2:13-CV-
0170 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 8, 2015); In re E. L du Pont de Nemours & Co. C-8
Personal Injury Litigation, No. 2:13-MD-2433 (S.D. Ohio filed Apr. 9, 2013).

                       TABLE OF CONTENTS

I.   THE PROBLEM  OF COMPLEX  SCIENTIFIC QUESTIONS IN
     LITIGATION        ...................................... .......16
II.  THE CREATION  OF THE C8 SCIENCE PANEL AND ITS ROLE IN
     BARTLE.T..............................................17
III. A NORMATIVE  FRAMEWORK   FOR FAIRNESS IN ALTERNATIVE
     ADJUDICATION  AND ITS APPLICATION TO THE C8 SCIENCE
     PANEL.................................................21
IV.  THE EFFICACY OF THE C8 SCIENCE PANEL AS SEEN THROUGH  A
     NORMATIVE  FRAMEWORK   OF JURY FAIRNESS ...............24
     A. Factors that Advance the C8 Science Panel's Ability to
        Preserve Fairness    .................................24
     B. Limitations of the C8 Science Panel's Ability to Preserve
        Fairness ................................        .....27
     C. Summary:  Determining Uhat Is Most Fair for Complex
        Scientific Litigation  ...............................28
V.   THE FUTURE  OF COMPLEX SCIENTIFIC ADJUDICATION & POLICY
     PERSPECTIVES IN PRESERVING FAIRNESS IN LITIGATION ...........29






     * J.D. Candidate 2016, The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law; B.A., The
Ohio University. Thanks to Professor Cinnamon Carlarne, Chelsea Freeman, Philip Krzeski,
Howard Harcha, Kristen Maiorino, and the staff of the Ohio State Law Journal for their
incredibly helpful comments, insight, and advice on this piece.
    'Bartlett v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., No. 2:13-CV-0170 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 8,
2015). See Bartlett Verdict and Settlement Summary, JVR No. 1601150042, 2015 WL
9841769, for a selection of court filings from the case.


Vol. 77]


15

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most