About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

6 Necmettin Erbakan Universitesi Hukuk Fakultesi Dergisi 1 (2023)

handle is hein.journals/necmettin6 and id is 1 raw text is: 






P   RL S S


Necmettin   Erbakan   niversitesi Hukuk Fakiltesi Dergisi (NECHFD)
                Journal  of Necmettin   Erbakan   University  Faculty  of Law
                                           DOI:  10.51120/NEUHFD.2023.66


Fransa'da Mahkeme Kararlarna Karpi Yasal Geeerlilik Uygulamasi ve

                                    Ulkemizde Uygulanabilirligi*


                                         Ahmet Ziya CALIKAN
          Dr. Ogr. Dyesi, Selguk  Universitesi, Hukuk  Fakiiltesi, Idare Hukuku Anabilim   Dall, Konya, Tirkiye
                             azic @ selcuk.edu.tr  (Sorumlu   Yazar / Corresponding  Author)


Makale Bilgileri

Makale   Geemii
Gelid: 30.09.2022
Kabul:  14.11.2022
Yayin:  06.01.2023

Anahtar   Kelimeler:
Yasal  Gegerlilik, Idari
Yargi, Iptal Karan,
Kamu   Yaran.


OZ


Ozellikle Fransiz Hukukunda uygulamasim bulan dava edilmis idan tasarruflara yasal gegerlilik kazandirma uygulamasiyla,
genellikle iptal edilme ihtimali bulunan veya yerine gore ilk derece yargilamasinda iptal edilmis bir idari tasarrufun, hatta idarenin
bazi ozel hukuka tabi tasarruflannn, gikarnlan bir kanunla, ceza ve yaptlnm uygulamalan hari olmak 0zere, gegmie etkili bir
ekilde, kamu yaran amaciyla yasal koruma altina alnmasi soz konusudur. Bu ekilde davan konusuz kalmasi saglanmaktadir.
Mahkemelerce de karar vemeye yer olmadigma karar verilmektedir. Burada tamamen adil yargilanma hakki ve yargi
bagimsizhgi denkleminde, kuvvetler aynligi ile kamu yaran kavramlan arasinda bir denge godulerek bir karara varilmaktadir.
Gerek Fransiz Damstayi (Conseil d'Etat) gerekse Anayasa Konseyi ol69 olarak bu gibi kriterler kullanmaktadir. Kamnu yaran
6190tune bagvurulan en yaygin ornek olarak bir kamu hizmetinin igleyisinin ve surekliliginin saglanmasi veya kamu personelinin
kariyer yapmasimn saglanmasi, sosyal guvenlik sistemindeki dengeyi bozup buna zarar verecek igtihat farkliliklarimn onlenmesi
gibi ihtimaller verilebilir.
Ulkemizde benzer bir uygulama Anayasa'mn Mahkemelerin Bagimsizhgi baglikli 138. maddesine gore gok da mumkun
gozokmoyor. Soz konusu maddeye gore; Yasama ve yirotme organlari ile idare, mahkeme kararlanna uymak zorundadir; bu
organlar ve idare, mahkeme kararlanni higbir suretle degistiremez ve bunlann yerine getirilmesini geciktiremez.
Ulkemizde mahkeme kararlanna yasal gegerlilik kazandirma anlamina gelebilecek bir uygulama olarak, 2012 yihnda 4046 sayih
Ozellestirme Uygulamalan Hakkinda Kanun'a bir madde eklenerek, ozellestirme uygulamalann mahkemelerce iptali uzerine
olusacak fiili imkansizlik kargisinda geri donilemeyecek bir yapimn ortaya gikmasi halinde yargi kararlanmn uygulanmasina
yonelik olarak, Bakanlar Kurulu tesis edilecek is ve iglemler konusunda karar almaya yetkilidir, eklinde bir duzenleme yapilip
kanunlarmisti. Anayasa Mahkemesi 2013 yihnda verdigi kararla soz konusu duzenlemenin Anayasa'n 138. maddesine aykri
olduguna karar verdi ve bu yonteme bagvurulmasimn Onjn0 kapatmis oldu. Anayasa'n  138. maddesinde bir degigiklik
yapilmadigi veya Anayasa Mahkemesi bu konudaki tutumunu degistirmedigi takdirde, ilkemizde boyle bir uygulamaya gitmek
qok mumkun gozukmuyor.


Implementation Of Legal Validity Against Court Decisions In France And Applicability In
                                                        Our Country


Article Info


ABSTRACT


Article History
Received:  30.09.2022
Accepted:   14.11.2022
Published:  06.01.2023

Keywords:

Legal  Validity,
Administrative
Judgment,   Annulment
Decision,  Public
Interest.


With the practice of giving legal validity to the sued administrative acts, which is especially applied in French Law,
an administrative act that is likely to be annulled or that has been canceled in the first instance jurisdiction is put under
legal protection for the purpose of public interest, with a retroactive effect. Penalties and sanctions are excluded from
this application. It is also possible to apply this method for some private law dispositions of the administration. By
this way, the dispute is led to devoid of essence and courts held that there is no need to make a decision. Here, in the
equation of the right to a fair trial and the independence of the judiciary, a decision is reached by keeping a balance
between the concepts of separation of powers and public interest. The most common example of using the public
interest criterion is to ensure the functioning and continuity of a public service, or to ensure the career of civil servants,
and to prevent case-law differences that will disrupt the balance in the social security system and damage it.
A  similar practice in our country does not seem possible according to Article 138 of the Constitution titled
Independence of the Courts. According to the said article, Legislative and executive organs and the administration
must comply with court decisions (...).
In 2012, an article was added to the Law No. 4046 on Privatization Practices, as an application that could mean giving
legal validity to court decisions in our country. The Constitutional Court annulled this article in 2013. Unless an
amendment  is made in Article 138 of the Constitution or the Constitutional Court does not change its stance on this
issue, it does not seem possible to adopt such a practice in our country.


Atif/Citation: Qahkan. A. Z. (2023). Fransa'da Mahkeme Kararlanna Karsi Yasal Gegerlilik Uygulamasi ve
Ulkemizde Uygulanabilirligi, Necmettin Erbakan Universitesi Hukuk Fakultesi Dergisi, 6(1), s. 1-24.

Plagiarism: Bu makale intihal programmda tamnm$ ve en az iki hakem incelemesinden gegmistir. // This article has
been  scanned   via a plagiarism   software  and  reviewed   by  at least two referees.


    c       t           This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0)






    * Bu galhgma 13-15 Mayis 2022 tarihleri arasinda yapilan Uluslararasi Necmettin Erbakan Hukuk Kongresi'nde sunulan bildirinin makale olarak duzenlenmis halidir.


NEU HF                                                                                     0

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most