About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

23 Legal Ethics 1 (2020)

handle is hein.journals/lethics23 and id is 1 raw text is: LEGAL ETHICS                                                             Routled     e
2020, VOL. 23, NOS. 1-2, 1-2
https://doi.org/10.1080/1460728x.2020.1865508                            Taylor & Francis Group
Editorial
This has been a profoundly disrupted year. Many of us have had some of our normal free-
doms curtailed in the interests of public health. Some view those restrictions as no greater
than necessary to mitigate the risks caused by Covid-19, others consider that governments
and others have taken the opportunity to use the health emergency as a means to reduce free-
doms or to turn away from those most disadvantaged such that inequality has increased
during this period.
Lawyers are often at the forefront of the fight to champion the rights of those least able to
defend themselves but it can be difficult to know how best to contribute to justice in a period
of such uncertainty. Anna Cody's article 'Reflection and clinical legal education: how do stu-
dents learn about their ethical duty to contribute towards justice' provides evidence of ways in
which we may develop nascent lawyers' abilities to reflect so as to support them to contribute
to justice and the effective functioning of the legal system. She uses the opportunity afforded
by 'disorienting moments' to assist law students to make sense of complexity and to deter-
mine how best to act. This article discusses a range of methods by which legal educators
may help law students to address and integrate values, emotions, thinking and analytical
skills. In doing so she hopes that we may further our students' aspirations to fulfil their
ethical duty to work towards justice in whatever form they are drawn to.
Allan C. Hutchinson's essay 'Practising law for rich and poor people: towards a more pro-
gressive approach' takes Stephen Wexler's essay 'Practicing Law for Poor People' as a starting
point to review and develop the debate about the proper role and responsibilities of those who
practise law for the disadvantaged. Hutchinson's essay reflects on the challenges that lawyers
face, the extent to which they have met those challenges in the intervening fifty years since
Wexler's essay and the extent to which they may have contributed to the institutionalization
of poverty by the way that they have used the law as lawyers. Hutchinson's focus in the essay is
on the way in which lawyers may change their contribution to the institutionalization of
poverty by uncoupling or at least weakening the link between law, wealth and power.
Kim Economides and Joaquim Leonel de Rezende Alvim's article 'Bar exams, legal ethics
and the fight against corruption: lessons from Brazil' provides a detailed and nuanced assess-
ment of the contribution of Bar exams in Brazil to the professional socialisation of lawyers.
They analyse the changing content of the exams, the balance between subjects and the foci
of the questions as well as the drivers behind these changes. This provides interesting insights
into the way in which vocational training and the ethics of legal professionals may be
influenced by media representations of lawyers, the discourse of corruption and attempts
to address it. Thy posit that these insights may provide a potential guide to inform future
legal education and training not just in Brazil but beyond.
Marc Mason's 'Entity regulation, litigation rights and the changing meaning of profession-
alism at the Bar of England and Wales' considers the changes wrought on litigation practice
by barristers by the introduction of legal market liberalisation in England and Wales courtesy
of the Legal Services Act 2007. His article examines amendments to the Bar Standards Hand-
book and ethical implications for the barrister's profession. It situates these changes within
existing theoretical understandings of the legal professions and professionalism and argues

© 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most