About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

10 J. Int'l Disp. Settlement 1 (2019)

handle is hein.journals/jloildte10 and id is 1 raw text is: 


Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 2019, 10, 1-22
doi: 10.1093/jnlids/idy001
Advance  Access Publication Date: 26 March 2018
Article


      The Right to Be Unheard: Recognition and

  Enforcement of Anti-Suit Injunctions Issued by

                         Arbitrators in the EU

             Pawel   Marcisz*   and  Aleksandra Orzel-Jakubowska**



                                     ABSTRACT
   The  article discuses recognition and enforcement of anti-suit injunctions issued by ar-
   bitral tribunals in the EU, taking into account limitations on arbitrators' power to issue
   the injunctions as well as their legal effects in various jurisdictions. We critically evalu-
   ate the consistency of the CJEU's approach  to anti-suit injunctions as presented in
   West  Tankers and in Gazprom. To this end, we compare effects of anti-suit injunctions
   from  state courts and these from arbitral tribunals on the efficiency of EU law and the
   fundamental  rights that it protects. Special regard is paid to the right to legal protection
   as enshrined in Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Right.


                                1. INTRODUCTION
Several months   before the Court  of Justice of the European Union   (CJEU)  rendered
a judgment  in West  Tankers,'Thomas   Raphael  wrote:

   If the European  Court  of Justice does hold that the English Court  cannot  grant
   anti-suit injunctions to enforce an arbitration clause, one obvious alternative option
   for the injunction claimant is to seek an analogous order from the arbitrators.


This  author also noted that there was  a growing number   of decisions reported where
arbitrators have granted anti-suit injunctions.3


*   University of Warsaw, Faculty of Law and Administration, Department of European Law. Email:
    p.marciszcuw.edu.pl
 ** University of Warsaw, Faculty of Law and Administration, Department of Civil Procedure. Email:
    a.orzelcwpia.uw.edu.pl. The research presented in this article was conducted at LSE during the ETIUDA
    scholarship (No DEC-2016/20/T/H5/00408) financed by the Polish National Science Centre. I would like
    to thank Professor Jan Kleinheisterkamp for his kind support in conducting my research at LSE.
 1  CJEU  Case C-185/07 Allianz SpA, Generali Assicurazioni Generali SpA v West Tankers Inc. [2009]
    ECLI:EU:C:2009:69. See also H Seriki, Injunctive Relief and International Arbitration (Informa Law 2015)
    55ff.
 2  T Raphael, The Anti-Suit Injunction (OUP 2008) 285 (512.26).
 3  ibid 197, ¶7.41. Some authors use the term 'antisuit order' to refer to an anti-suit injunction issued by an
    arbitral tribunal, to distinguish them from anti-suit injunctions issued by state courts. But in this article, we


© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com


. 1

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most