About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

25 J. Pol. Stud. 1 (2018)

handle is hein.journals/jlo25 and id is 1 raw text is: 


Journal of Political Studies, Vol. 25, Issue - 1, 2018, 01:16


Pakistan's  Search  for Security through Reliable Balance of Power and Nuclear
                                    Weapons

                                Hassan  Masood

                                    Abstract

At  the time of independence  Pakistan faced severe  insecurity emanating from  a
fractured geography,  non-existent constitutional framework, weak  economy,  and
military capability in the face of an overwhelmingly powerful and hostile India. The
paper explores Pakistan's efforts for establishing a reliable balance of power with
India first by joining the collective security later supplementing it by joining alliances.
It argues that the secession of East Pakistan was the turning point establishing the
unreliability of the erstwhile basis of balance of power, leading Pakistan to the
development  of nuclear weapons  as a reliable basis for a Pakistan-India balance of
power while retaining the earlier two bases.

Keywords:  Pakistan, security, balance of power, collective security, alliances, nuclear
weapons

The  Perspective

At  the time  of independence  in  1947  the founder  of Pakistan  Quaid-e-Azam
Muhammad Ali   Jinnah had political differences with the British Viceroy to India Lord
Mountbatten. Their primary source was the latter's insistence on becoming the joint
Governor  General of India and Pakistan (Hamid, 1986, p.199 and p.201) which the
former denied. Lord Mountbatten threatened the founder of Pakistan with establishing
a Pakistan which would  not be able to survive for long (Hamid, 1986, p. 235). The
implementation of that threat brought forth its multiple dimensions. For example, one
of the aspects was  the boundary  commission's  award at the time of partition. It
divided Punjab on the basis of Muslim and Sikh majority into West and East Punjab.
Later was  given to India along with the three tehsils of Muslim majority District
Gurdaspur  i.e. Pathankot, Gurdaspur and Batala. Out of these only Pathankot had a
non-Muslim  majority. The fourth tehsil Shakargarh which also had a Muslim majority
was  given to Pakistan. District Gurdaspur was also contiguous to Pakistan. Indian
control over Gurdaspur  and  Batala provided critical land access to Indian Army
(Hamid,  1986, p.203) during its campaign for the occupation of Jammu Kashmir and
Laddakh  in April 1948. The short-term objective of Indian occupation was to control
immediate  watershed or headwork  of all Pakistani rivers emanating from Kashmir
which was partially achieved.
While  the long-term objective has been  progressive occupation of undemarcated
stretches of the Line of Control (LoC) and ultimately link-up with Afghanistan and
Indian occupation of Siachen  in 1984 was  move  in that direction. If successfully
created, that land corridor will in the first place, enable India to bypass Pakistan in its

*Author is Ph.D. scholar, Department of Defence and Strategic Studies, Quaid-e-Azam
University, Islamabad.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most