About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

4 J. Int'l Banking Reg. 7 (2002-2003)

handle is hein.journals/jlbkrg4 and id is 1 raw text is: Editorial
Terrorism and international finance:
Recent developments from the
perspective of international law

Just 13 days after the USA was attacked by
terrorists, President Bush signed an Execu-
tive Order freezing the assets of 27 organi-
sations and persons known to be linked to
Al-Q'aeda and suspected of funding terror-
ism. Significantly, he called on foreign
banks to follow his example, or have their
US assets frozen. He said that this war was to
be a conflict 'without battlefields and beach-
heads'. In a real sense, it was launched not on
the battlefield, but in the financial field.
Since then, the USA has made it a policy
objective to deny terrorist groups access to
the international financial system, to impair
the ability of terrorists to fund raise, and to
expose, isolate and incapacitate the financial
networks of terrorists. Many more names
followed. The objective has been pursued
across the financial community without
regard to frontiers, and a new reality is
rapidly emerging on the financial scene.
Inevitably, the background lies in the
development of modern finance and the rise
in global capital. One result of globalisation
and technology is that it is much easier to
move money around. The figures are very
large. In April 2000, the Bank of England
estimated the average daily turnover in the
London foreign exchange market alone at
$637bn.2 At the consumer level, credit and
debit cards provide ready access to funds
internationally. As the financial system
grew, policy makers began to appreciate its
potential as a means of exerting pressure.
Conversely, the need to prevent abuse also

became apparent. I will take as a starting
point December 1985, when terrorist attacks
took place against Rome and Vienna air-
ports. President Reagan cited these attacks
to justify the imposition of sanctions on
Libya, and by an executive order made on
8th January, 1986, blocked Libyan assets
held in the USA and US dollar deposits in
US banks' overseas branches. The order fol-
lowed the same pattern as the freeze that had
been imposed on Iranian assets after the hos-
tage crisis of 1979-81. That long running
matter remains unresolved, probably to
Iran's disadvantage. The US-Iran claims tri-
bunal continues its work to this day. But
these were unilateral sanctions. Particularly
in the case of Libya, their effectiveness was
undermined by the refusal of foreign courts
to recognise their extraterritorial effect, even
with regard to US dollar deposits held in
local branches of US incorporated banks.3
Compare the position at the interna-
tional level. On 21st December, 1988, Pan
Am flight 103 was brought down by a
bomb over Lockerbie in Scotland. The
finger of suspicion again pointed to Libya.
This time, there was sufficient consensus
for international sanctions. The process was
not speedy. Financial sanctions were not
imposed until 11th November, 1993.4 But
once imposed, UN sanctions did not suffer
from the inherent weakness of unilateral
sanctions. They were applied, at least in
principle, so as to freeze assets internation-
ally, depending upon the effectiveness of

Journal of International Banking
Regulation, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2002,
pp. 7-12
© Henry Stewart Publications,
1465-4830

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most