About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

30 J. Legal Aspects Sport 1 (2020)

handle is hein.journals/jlas30 and id is 1 raw text is: Journal of LegalAspects of Sport, 2020, 30, 1 - 17 https://doi.org/10.18060/23892 © Steven A. Bank FIFA, Forced Arbitration, and the U.S. Soccer Lawsuits Steven A. Bank* American soccer has been besieged by lawsuits. In the last two years alone, the United States Soccer Federation (U.S. Soccer) has been hit with two antitrust lawsuits, two Equal Pay Act and Title VII gender discrimination lawsuits, and a trademark lawsuit, while two of its professional league members are engaged in their own trademark lawsuit. One threshold question that has received scant attention in the media is whether these disputes should be in federal court at all. Under the Statutes and Regulations of the Fdddration Internationale de Football Association (FIFA), soccer's global governing organization, all disputes are required to be arbitrated. Taking a dispute to an ordinary court of law is potentially subject to sanction, which could include suspension or even expulsion. Given this forced arbitration rule, this article considers several possible explanations for why there has been no push to arbitrate the disputes in most of the lawsuits: (1) The enforceability of FIFA's arbitration requirement has been called into question by recent rulings against forced arbitration clauses; (2) FIFA focuses the enforcement of its arbitration requirement on certain types of cases; (3) FIFA does not consider certain types of claims subject to arbitration; and (4) U.S. Soccer's bylaws do not impose the arbitration requirement in such a way as it would apply to these types of cases. Although none of these entirely resolve the matter in a satisfactory way, in the aggregate they may help to define the emerging limits to arbitration for sports governing bodies in the U.S. and elsewhere. Keywords: arbitration, antitrust, Equal Pay Act, Title VII, trademark, soccer, FIFA Introduction American soccer has been besieged by lawsuits in the last few years. In September of 2017, the North American Soccer League (NASL') filed an antitrust lawsuit against the United States Soccer Federation (U.S. Soccer) in federal court, alleging that USSF conspired with Major League Soccer (MLS) to erect and arbitrarily apply a shifting set of divisional sanctioning requirements that prevented NASL from challenging MLS for supremacy in U.S. soccer.' A little over a year later, in December of 2018, the U.S. Soccer Complaint, N. Am. Soccer League, LLCv. U.S. Soccer Fed'n, Inc., No. 1:17-cv-05495 (E.D.N.Y. filed Sept. 19, 2017). * Steven A. Bank, JD, is the Vice Dean for Curricular and Academic Affairs and the Paul Hast- ings Professor of Business Law, UCLA School of Law; email: banklaw.ucla.edu. He wishes to thank Jackson Sullivan for research assistance and Camille Comte for translation assistance. n

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most