About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

5 JLL 1 (2016)

handle is hein.journals/jlangaw5 and id is 1 raw text is: 





                                                              International Journal of
                                                                  LANGUAGE & LAW

                                                             Smolka &Pirker, )LL5 (2016): 1-40
                                                                  w Ia          dw de






International Law and Pragmatics

- An Account of Interpretation in International Law

Jennifer Smolka and Benedikt Pirker*

Abstract
In this interdisciplinary paper, a legal scholar and a linguist aim to combine the scientific
strands of linguistics and international law. Linguistics, and especially pragmatics, has not yet
been fully integrated into the study of interpretation in international law, although some in-
ternational legal scholars have started to apply the labels linguistic or pragmatic to their
work on interpretation. While they do take into account research in the field of law and lan-
guage, there is a tendency to follow very traditional approaches according to which seman-
tics and pragmatics are divided into neatly separated domains. We posit a parallel between
legal interpretation and pragmatics. Pragmatics has evolved from the so-called waste-
basket of linguistics to become a fully-fledged discipline. The same should be true of legal
interpretation and its study in international law, which should no longer be considered
merely a legal afterthought- as if meaning were all in the text. We argue that scientifically
grounded pragmatics should be applied to legal interpretation. Recent research in linguis-
tics and pragmatics, and the concepts that such research has provided, may also help us to
build a stronger scientific foundation for the debate within international law on interpreta-
tion. Integrating pragmatics may allow for a more suitable model of legal interpretation
than the sociological approaches some international lawyers have turned to. This may also
provide a plausible link between the actors and structures of legal interpretation.

Keywords
International law, legal interpretation, law and language, linguistics, semantics, pragmatics,
cognitive sciences, i nterdiscipl inarity

Submitted: 19 October 2015, accepted: 28 March 2016, published online: 8 August 2016



   * Smolka: Freelance Translator (M.A., University of Mainz, Certificate of Specialisation in Linguistics, Univer-
sity of Geneva), e; Pirker: Senior Lecturer, University of Fribourg,
             . The authors would like to thank Ziv Bohrer, Markus Kern, Thomas Burri, Moshe Hirsch, An-
toine Auchlin, Dieter Stein, Friedemann Vogel, Kali Tal, and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments
on earlier versions of this article. Research for the article has been kindly supported by the )ean Nordmann
Foundation. All errors remain within our responsibility.

    International Journal of Language & Law vol. 5 (2016)                             1
    DO I:

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most