About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

5 Jurisprudence 1 (2014)

handle is hein.journals/jisprud5 and id is 1 raw text is: DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5235/20403313.5.1.1

The Jurisprudence Annual Lecture 2014
Law and the Normativity of Obligation
Thomas Pink*
1. THE PROBLEM OF OBLIGATION
In Appendix IV to An Enquiry Concerning the Pinciples of Morals, 'Of some verbal
disputes', David Hume criticised what he took to be a serious distortion in moral
theory:
Philosophers, or rather divines under that disguise, treating all morals as on a like foot-
ing with civil laws, guarded by sanctions of reward and punishment, were necessarily
led to render this circumstance, of voluntary or involuntary, the foundation of their
whole theory ... but this, in mean time, must be allowed, that sentiments are every day
experienced of blame and praise, which have objects beyond the dominion of the will
or choice, and of which it behoves us, if not as moralists, as speculative philosophers at
least, to give some satisfactory theory and explication.1
Hume claimed to be uncovering an unwarranted intrusion into moral theory of
notions from positive law. The possibility for such distortion is provided by the
notion of obligation or duty, and by related notions of responsibility and blame,
which, on the surface at least, very much seem to be shared between morality and
positive law. 'You have an obligation to pay the money' could be said by a moralist
asserting a moral obligation-or by ajudge or state official asserting a legal obliga-
tion, that is an obligation under some system of positive law. Andjust as one can be
under obligations that are legal as well as moral, so one can be held legally as well
as morally responsible, and legally as well as morally to blame.
In Hume's view, philosophical accounts of moral obligation, responsibility and
blame were being distorted through the remodelling of these notions as involving a
moral form of positive law, and so a moral version of a legal obligation or duty. The
people doing the remodelling were theologians pretending to be philosophers,
and importing into moral theory a moral version of the coercive authority involved
Professor of Philosophy, King's College London, UK.
1 David Hume, An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals, PH Nidditch (ed) (Clarendon Press,
1975) Appendix iv, 'Of some verbal disputes', p 322.

(2014) 5 (1) jurisprudence 1-28

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most