About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

40 J.C. & U.L. [i] (2014)

handle is hein.journals/jcolunly40 and id is 1 raw text is: 




                      THE JOURNAL OF
          COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY LAW

Volume 40                       2014                       Number 1


                             ARTICLES

Assignment of Income at the Ivory Tower: Relaxing the Tax
Treatment of Services Donated to Charities by their Employees
                                               Mark J. Cowan

   When a faculty member donates time to a college or university
by, for example, teaching a summer course for no compensation,
the federal income tax treatment of the donation can take one of
two forms. One possibility is that the donation will have no tax
consequences. The faculty member realizes no income from the
donation and gets no charitable deduction. A second possibility is
that the faculty member will be required to recognize taxable
income equal to the value of the services provided and then may
(subject to certain limits) be allowed a charitable contribution
deduction. In many cases, the income and deduction do not fully
offset, resulting in negative tax consequences for the faculty
member. This second possibility occurs when the faculty member
directs where the funds saved by the donation are used within the
institution. Since faculty members normally would prefer to
control the specific use of the saved funds, many donations would
result in negative tax consequences sufficient to stifle the donation
in the first place. This article argues that the tax law should be
clarified and relaxed to allow faculty members (and other
employees of charitable organizations) to donate time to their
employer institutions on a tax-free basis in more situations than is
currently the case. Alternatively, the article suggests ways for
charities to encourage donations of time by employees, even in the
absence of a favorable law change.


Judicial Review of NCAA Eligibility Decisions: Evaluation of
the Restitution Rule and a Call for Arbitration
         Stephen F. Ross, Richard T. Karcher, S. Baker Kensinger   79

   Courts have held that the general principles of judicial non-
interference with the internal decisions of private associations do
not apply where a dominant organization's decisions effectively
prevent individuals from participating in an important activity,
including a profession or sport. Although the bylaws of the

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most