About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

30 J. Conflict Resol. 3 (1986)

handle is hein.journals/jcfltr30 and id is 1 raw text is: Arms Races and War Initiation SOME ALTERNATIVES TO THE INTRILIGATOR-BRITO MODEL THOMAS F. MAYER Department of Sociology University of Colorado Intriligator and Brito argue that certain arms races can lead to peace and certain disarming races can lead to war. They support this position with a formal model of the relationship between weapons levels and war initiation. This article evaluates and criticizes the Intriligator-Brito model. The results of their model are shown to depend upon questionable assumptions both about the conditions under which nuclear attack might be initiated or deterred and about the nature of nuclear war itself. Two sets of alternatives to the Intriligator-Brito (I-B) model are developed. In contrast to the Intrili- gator-Brito analysis, most of the topologies generated by the alternative models suggest that arms races are unlikely to yield stable peace. The issue of disarmament is more complicated. If security is identified with the ability to inflict painful retribution on the enemy, then situations of near complete disarmament are necessarily hazardous. However, the main implication of the alternative models is that mutual disarmament-at least mutual disarmament to moderate weapons levels-will not increase the chance of war and may well diminish it. At least one of the alternative models points out that no situation of mutual deterrence may be possible. Arms races may not always lead to war nor disarmament to peace, but considerable circumspection is needed when drawing policy inferences from war initiation models of the Intriligator-Brito genre because the results are highly sensitive to the underlying assumptions. THE INTRILIGATOR-BRITO MODEL OF WAR INITIATION Intriligator and Brito (1984) have challenged the idea that arms races inevitably lead to war. They develop a model of war initiation showing that although some arms races may lead to war, others can bring stable peace. According to their model, the process of disarmament can also AUTHOR'S NOTE: I would like to thank Frank Beer, Francis Campbell, Dennis Ehmsen, Michael Intriligator, Robert Johnson, Sara Mayer, Martin Patchen, Jean Umbreit, and Michael Ward for their help in preparing this article. None of these people should be held responsible for the conclusions it reaches or any errors it may contain. JOURNAL OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION, Vol. 30 No. 1, March 1986 3-28 @ 1986 Sage Publications, Inc. 3 from the SAGE Social Science Collections. All Rights Reserved.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most