About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

113 J.L. Pol'y & Globalization 1 (2021)

handle is hein.journals/jawpglob113 and id is 1 raw text is: 




ISSN 2224-3240 (Paper) ISSN 2224-3259 (Online)
Vol.113, 2021                                                                                                 115%


    Africanacity of International Investment Law: A Reflection on

                             Investment Agreements in Africa

                                                    Ally Possi*

Abstract
In recent times, we  have been  witnessing  the re-making  of international investment  law (IIL) architect maiden
from  Africa.  The  reforms  shift the IIL  paradigm  by  establishing  adequate  policy  space to  the host  state,
reiterating state sovereignty  and,  significantly, introducing  obligations  imposed   on  the foreign  investors.
Alongside   these reforms, Africans  are persistently negating the speculative imbalanced   international investor-
state dispute settlement (ISDS)  system  by suggesting  local alternatives. These reforms can be traced to the Pan
African  Investment   Code  of  2016,  which  shapes  the African  IIL  agenda.  Thus,  this monograph   discusses
Africa's  recent surge of reforms  on  IIL which  transform  the traditional regime. These  commendable reforms
give African  states an opportunity to regulate IIL  and guard  their own interests. Yet the reforms are already
showing   some  signs of incoherence, particularly on the binding nature of investment treaty models  and on ISDS
mechanisms,   which  may  potentially negate the thrust of what this monograph dubs  as the Africanacity of IIL.
Keywords: Africanacity, International   Investment  law, Investment  Treaty Model,  ISDS, RECs,   Sub-regional.
DOI:   10.7176/JLPG/113-01
Publication  date: September  30th 2021

1.  Introduction
In  recent decades,  African  states have been  transforming   international investment  law  (IIL) through  treaty
reforms  and the enactment  of domestic  law.1 These  reforms provide  a genuine  gesture of what  this monograph
dubs  as the Africanacity of IIL. The reforms  redirect the historical path that most African countries have had to
follow  as constrained by the unexpected  outcomes  of receiving foreign investment.  The current developments   in
investment  law  and policy  in Africa are driven by  Africa and  permeate  through  bilateral, regional and global
international instruments. Ordinarily, the IIL regime is subject to customary international law, bilateral, regional,
and  multilateral investment treaties, and free trade agreements  (FTAs)   with specific investment  provisions  or
chapters.2 In this monograph,  the stated reforms are dubbed  as the Africanacity of IIL. The term is used in the
sense  of preserving African  interests in establishing investment policy, legal and institutional frameworks  that
govern  IIL.
     There   is  a  surge  of  IIL  transformation  through   regionalism   in  the entire  world, 3  and  African
intergovernmental  organisations  are not to be left behind as this takes place. It comes at a time when most of the
investment  agreements   in Africa were  endorsed  during the post-colonial era, the time  in which  African states
were  desperate to reinvent their economies.4 During  that period the field was notorious5 (in fact, it still is) for the
complicity  of investors  in the host states and  the controversies they  generated,6 including  the jurisprudence
emanating  from  the arbitral tribunals.
      IIL in Africa  is dominated  by  bilateral investment treaties entered into between   African  countries and

 LLB  (Mzumbe); LLM (UCT); LLD (Pretoria) Post-Doctoral Fellow (North-West University, South Africa); Advocate of the High Court of
 Tanzania/Zanzibar; Deputy Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Information, Culture, Arts and Sports - United Republic of Tanzania
 (allv.possi(tthotmail.com). Views expressed in this article do not in any way express views of the Government of the United Republic of
 Tanzania.
 ' See Akinkugbe, O.D., Africanization and the reform of international investment law, Case Western Reserve Journal ofInternational Law,
 53.1, 2021, pp. 7-32. For novelty on Africanisation of International investment law see: Nagar D. & Mutasa C., Africa and the world:
 bilateral and multilateral international diplomacy, Cham: Springer, 2018; Mbengue M. M & Ngangjoh-Hodu Y. (eds), African perspectives
 in international investment law . Manchester, Manchester University Press, 2020; Schill S.W., The New African Regionalism in
 International Investment Law, Journal of World Investment & Trade, 18.3, 2017, pp. 367-369; Gathii J.T., Agreement Establishing The
 African Continental Free Trade Area, International legal materials, 58.5, 2019, p. 1028-1083; Adeleke F., International investment law and
policy in Africa: exploring a human rights based approach to investment regulation and dispute settlement, Oxon: Routledge, 2017; Odularu
G. & Bamidele A., Negotiating south-south regional trade agreements: economic opportunities and policy directions for Africa, Cham,
Springer Nature, 2017; Nwankwo C.M., Balancing international investment law and climate change in Africa: assessing vertical and
horizontal norms, Manchester Journal of International Economic Law, 17.1, 2020, p. 48-63; Collins D., An Introduction to international
investment law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017 at 39.
2 Investment policies and bilateral investment treaties in Africa: implications for regional integration, United Nations Economic Commission
for Africa (Feb. 2016), https://www.uneca.org/sites/default/files/PublicationFiles/en (accessed 24 July 2021).
s Akinkugbe O.D., Theorizing developmental regionalism in narratives of African regional trade agreements, African Journal of
International Economic Law, 1.1, 2020, pp. 291-320.
4 Mbengue M.M. & Schacherer S., The 'Africanization' of international investment law: the pan-African investment code and the reform of
the international investment regime, Journal of World Investment & Trade, 18.3, p. 437-448, at 437.
5 See Sornarajah M., The international law and foreign investment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
6 See generally, Odumosu IT., The antinomies of the continued relevance of ICSID to the third world, San Diego International Law
Journal, 8.1, 2007, pp. 345-384, at 346.


1


Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization


Iisllste.Or,

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most