About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

2 IPCLJ 1 (2016)

handle is hein.journals/ipclj2 and id is 1 raw text is: Clark: Our Time is Better Spent Influencing Future Disruption OUR TIME IS BETTER SPENT INFLUENCING FUTURE DISRUPTION: A CALL TO END THE INDISCRIMINATE WAR AGAINST SELF-HELP LEGAL TECHNOLOGY Olivia Clark Abstract Under the guise of consumer protection, lawyers and bar associations have used disparate litigious mechanisms to thwart, inadvertently or not, the use of self-help legal technology. This paper will demonstrate that such adversity is not logical after a consideration of the technical functions that the software performs and unduly restricts underserved populations' access to the law because of the misapplication of policy to vaguely worded laws. This paper will provide a thorough analysis of legal action taken against the high-profile company LegalZoom under the theory of unauthorized practice of law provides direct support of this claim. Summary and critique of this litigation will demonstrate the real- world effects of the traditional legal industry's wielding of the weapon of unauthorized practice of law in order to resist disruptive legal technology. It will further consider whether the application of the unauthorized practice of law rules to legal technology logically align with policy reasons for the implementation of these rules. Comparing these policies to the American Bar Association recommendations on unauthorized practice of law regulation, this paper will consider their validity in light of emerging views of the relationship between the professional rules and legal technology. I argue that that more permissive regulation of self-help legal technology is better for two reasons. First, anticipating the precise scope of the benefits of legal technology in the future is not possible due to the fast pace of improvements. And second, permissive rules leave space for experimentation and innovation, maximizing the number of people who have access to affordable legal services. INTRODUCTION Any bright line separating what the practice of law is from what it is not becomes dimmer with each subsequent advance in legal technology. This article questions the validity of lawyers' resistance to computer assisted, self-help legal software. In fields outside of law, non-cognitive artificial intelligence completes tasks that were originally thought to require human intelligence in order to complete.1 LegalZoom's document drafting software uses decision tree software which operates on a series of rules I Harry Surden, Machine Learning and Law, 89 Wash. L. Rev. 87, 87 (2014). Published by University of Cincinnati College of Law Scholarship and Publications, 2016

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most