About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

10 Int'l Data Priv. L. 1 (2020)

handle is hein.journals/intldatpc10 and id is 1 raw text is: 


International Data Privacy Law, 2020, Vol. 10, No. 1


Opinions can be incorrect (in our

opinion)! On data protection law's

accuracy principle

Dara Hallinan* and Frederik Zuiderveen Borgesius**


Introduction
Since the early 1970s, the accuracy principle has been a
bulwark  of data protection law. Roughly  summarized,
the principle says that organizations that use personal
data must  ensure that personal data are reasonably cor-
rect. The accuracy principle is included in many  data
protection and information  privacy statutes around the
world. The  principle is also listed as one of the over-
arching  data protection  principles in the  European
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).'
   Even despite the significance and track-record of the
accuracy principle in data protection law, neither courts
nor scholars have felt it necessary to spend much time

*   Dara Hallinan, IGR, FIZ Karlsruhe - Leibniz-Institut fur
    Informationsinfrastruktur, Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1,
    Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany. E-mail: dara.hallinan@fiz-karls-
    ruhe.de. The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers and
    Noel Bangma.
**  Frederik Zuiderveen Borgesius, iHub and Institute for Computing and
    Information Sciences (iCIS), Radboud University, Nijmegen, The
    Netherlands.


or ink elaborating the content of the principle. Perhaps
the  principle is presumed   to  be  simple  and  self-
explanatory and thus without need  for conscious explo-
ration. As the UK  Information  Commissioner's   Office
has observed: 'It will usually be obvious whether per-
sonal data is accurate'.2
   Yet, for some types of personal data, the applicability
of the principle is far from self-explanatory. One such
case is that of personal data in the form of opinions-
also known  as inferences: personal data constituting an
assertion about an  data subject, built on the back of
facts about that subject, subjected to some interpretative
framework   to produce  new, probable  facts about that
data subject.
   The issue of the applicability of the accuracy princi-
ple to personal data in the form  of opinions has been
touched  on  by scholars, but not  discussed in depth.
Moreover,   scholars reach  contradictory  conclusions.
The  issue is not addressed in case law of the ECtHR or
the CJEU.  This  article thus focuses on the following
question: are personal data in the form of opinions sub-
ject to data protection  law's accuracy principle, and
should they be?
   Considering  both pro  and contra positions, we  ar-
gue  that personal data  in the form  of opinions  are,
and  should be, subject to data protection law's accu-
racy principle. To  keep  the discussion in the  paper
manageable,  we  focus on one example  of data protec-
tion law: the  GDPR.   Nevertheless, our  analysis and
conclusions  are generally applicable to all privacy and
data protection acts which include an accuracy princi-
ple-most   privacy and  data protection laws the world
over.

1   Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the
    Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard
    to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such
    data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection
    Regulation), OJ 2016 L 119/1, art 5(1)(d).
2   See: <https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/
    guide-to-the-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr/principles/accu
    racy/> accessed 10 October 2019.


© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com


1

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most