About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

3 HRLR Online 1 (2018)

handle is hein.journals/hrlro3 and id is 1 raw text is: 











PEREIRA V. SESSIONS: A JURISDICTIONAL
    SURPRISE FOR IMMIGRATION COURTS



                          Kit Johnson*

       The United  States Supreme Court issued a bombshell opinion
regarding immigration court procedure on June  21, 2018: Pereira v.
Sessions.' On its face, the case is a boon for certain noncitizens seeking
relief from  deportation. Yet, as  this Essay  explains, Pereira's
implications are far greater. Although the  Court's opinion never
mentions  jurisdiction, Pereira necessarily means that immigration
courts lack jurisdiction over virtually every case filed in the last three
years, plus an unknown  number  of earlier-filed cases. This situation
arises from the chronic failure of the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS) to comply with the law in commencing deportation proceedings.
With the clarity afforded by Pereira, the result is that these pending
removal cases should be dismissed.
       In an 8-1 decision, Pereira held that when a noncitizen receives
a document  called a notice to appear, and where that document does
not have a time or place listed for the removal proceedings, then it is
not a valid notice to appear, and thus it does not stop time for
purposes of establishing the noncitizen's continuous physical presence
in the United  States.2 That clock-stopping question was crucial in
Pereira, because the petitioner sought cancellation-of-removal relief,
which  is available only to noncitizens who can establish continuous
physical presence in the United States for ten years.3


   *   Associate Professor at the University of Oklahoma College of Law. I am
incredibly grateful to Steve Gensler, Jill Family, and Eric E. Johnson for their
comments on this draft. 02018 Kit Johnson. Konomark-Most rights sharable. See
konomark.org.
   1.  Pereira v. Sessions, 138 S.Ct. 2105 (U.S. June 21, 2018), available at
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/17-4591o13.pdf (to be reported at
484 U.S. _).
   2.  Id. at 2109-10.
   3.  Immigration  and  Nationality Act §  240A(b)(1)(A); 8 U.S.C.
§ 1229b(b)(1)(A) (2018).

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most