About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

2024 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y Per Curiam 1 (2024)

handle is hein.journals/hpercrm2024 and id is 1 raw text is: 



Harvard  Journal of Law &  Public Policy Per Curiam


IDEOLOGICAL LEANINGS IN LIKELY PRO BONO BIGLAW AMICUS BRIEFS IN THE

                              UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT


                                          DEREK   T. MULLER*


    Each  term, the United  States Supreme   Court  receives hundreds   of amicus  briefs filed in merits
docket  cases. These  totals have increased  over  the years,' and these briefs have  found  increasing
influence  in front of the Court.2 Many  of the largest law firms file amicus  briefs before the United
States Supreme Court.3 These amicus briefs are often pro bono, which means the clients do not
pay  for the firm to file the brief.4 That pro bono work  can quickly  total millions of dollars of legal
briefing subsidized   by the law  firm.5 And   pro bono  work   often reflects the law  firm's desire to
work  for its prior commitments to what it identifies   as the public  good.6

    Controversies   have  arisen in recent years over ideological  rifts in America's largest law firms,
sometimes for attorneys representing politically unpopular clients,7 at other times for publicly







   Professor of Law, Notre Dame Law School. Special thanks to Adam Feldman, Andy Hessick, and Kyle Rozema for
feedback on earlier drafts of this piece.
  1 See, e.g., Joseph D. Kearney & Thomas W. Merrill, The Influence of Amicus Curiae Briefs on the United States Supreme Court,
148 U. PA. L. REV. 743 (2000).
  2 Allison Orr Larsen & Neal Devins, The Amicus Machine, 102 VA. L. REV. 1901 (2016); Paul M. Collins, Jr., Pamela C. Corley,
& Jesse Hamner, The Influence of Amicus Curiae Briefs on U.S. Supreme Court Opinion Content, 49 L. & SOC. REV. 917 (2015).
  3 See, e.g., H.W. Perry Jr., The Elitification of the U.S. Supreme Court and Appellate Lawyering, 72 S.C. L. REV. 245, 262-63 (2020);
Larsen & Devins, supra note 2, at 1906-07, 1916-17, 1927-30.
  4 See Larsen & Davis, supra note 2, at 1918, 1929-31. See also Nancy Morawetz, Counterbalancing Distorted Incentives in Supreme
Court Pro Bono Practice: Recommendations for the New Supreme Court Pro Bono Bar and Public Interest Practice Communities, 86
N.Y.U. L. REV. 131 (2011).
  5 See infra note 12.
  6 See, e.g., Pro Bono, MORGAN LEWIS, https://  morganlewis.com/our-firm/our-culture/pro-bono (last visited Jan. 5, 2024)
(Our firm's commitment to doing work for the public good manifests through the pro bono efforts of lawyers in every one
of our global offices. We take on matters impacting individuals or small groups as well as litigation driving large-scale societal
change.); Pro Bono, ARNOLD & PORTER, https'/wwwarnoldportercom/en/about/pro-bono (last visited Jan. 5, 2024) (We
have a long history of taking on matters to redress injustice .... The broad spectrum of pro bono work we undertake is driven
by our dedication to amplifying the voices of those who might not otherwise be heard.); Pro Bono, CLEARY GOTTLIEB,
https://w -wclearvgottlieb com/practice-landingpro-bono (last visited Jan. 5, 2024) (Founded in a spirit of inclusiveness,
personal and professional responsibility, compassion for the needs of others, and dedication to improving the communities
in which we live and work, Cleary Gottlieb is fully committed to the duties of good global citizenship. We believe pro bono
work should be a mindful choice, one that expresses both personal and collective interests.).
  7 See, e.g., Marisa M. Kashino, Clement Praised by Peers for Leaving King & Spalding Over DOMA, WASHINGTONIAN, Apr. 25,
2011, https:// w .washingtonian.comI2011/04125/clement-praised-by-peers-for-leaving kingsp' ding-over-doma!; David
Lat, Paul Clement Leaves Kirkland & Ellis Amid a Dispute Over Gun Cases, ORIGINAL JURISDICTION, June 24, 2022,
httos://davidlat.substack.com/p/paul-clement-leaves-kirkland-and.


1


Winter  2024


No.  1

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most