About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

97 Minn. L. Rev. Headnotes 1 (2012-2013)

handle is hein.journals/headnotpan97 and id is 1 raw text is: Reply Burying Best Interests of the Resulting Child: A Response to Professors Crawford, Alvare, and Mutcherson I. Glenn Cohent I am gratified by the very kind remarks of Professors Crawford,' Alvar6,2 and Mutcherson3 in their separate respons- es to Regulating Reproduction4 and Beyond Best Interests, es- pecially since each of them writes work that I greatly admire and often rely on. Because I view responses like this as a means of crystallizing and helping to resolve disagreements, I focus here on those points where our views diverge rather than the issues on which we agree. However, I do not want to give the misleading impression that our points of disagreement are more significant than our points of agreement. If anything, I think the opposite is true. t Assistant Professor, Harvard Law School. Co-Director, Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics. J.D., Harvard Law School. Igcohen@law.harvard.edu. I thank Bridget Crawford, Helen Alvare, and Kim Mutcherson, not only for their excellent responses to my pa- pers, but for comments on my reply to those papers. Lisa Sullivan provided outstanding research assistance. Copyright © 2012 by I. Glenn Cohen. 1. Bridget J. Crawford, Authentic Reproductive Regulation, 96 MINN. L. REV. HEADNOTES 31 (2012), http://www.minnesotalawreview.org/wp-content/ uploads/2012/05/CrawfordFinal.pdf. 2. Helen M. Alvar6, A Response to Professor I. Glenn Cohen's Regulating Reproduction: The Problem with Best Interests, 96 MINN. L. REV. HEADNOTES 8 (2012), http://www.minnesotalawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Alv areFinal.pdf. 3. Kimberly M. Mutcherson, In Defense of Future Children: A Response to Cohen's Beyond Best Interests, 96 MINN. L. REV. HEADNOTES 46 (2012), http://www.minnesotalawreview.org/wp- content/uploads/2012/05/MutchersonFinal.pdf. 4. I. Glenn Cohen, Regulating Reproduction: The Problem with Best In- terests, 96 MINN. L. REV. 423 (2011) [hereinafter Cohen, Regulating Reproduc- tion]. 5. I. Glenn Cohen, Beyond Best Interests, 96 MINN. L. REV. 1187 (2012) [hereinafter Cohen, Beyond Best Interests].

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most