About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

75 UC L. J. 1 (2023-2024)

handle is hein.journals/hastlj75 and id is 1 raw text is: 













Articles


     Proving Actionable Racial Disparity Under the

                     California Racial Justice Act



    COLLEEN V. CHIENt, W. DAVID BALLtt, AND WILLIAM A. SUNDSTROMttt



Racial disparity is a fact of the United States criminal justice system, but under the Supreme
Court's holding in McCleskey  v. Kemp, racial disparities-even sizable, statistically signcant
disparities-do  not establish an equal protection violation without a showing of purposeful
discrimination. The California Racial Justice Act (CRJA), enacted in 2020 andfurther amended
in 2022, introduced a first-of-its-kind test for actionable racial disparity even in the absence of a
showing  of intent, allowing for reliefwhen the totality ofthe evidence demonstrates a signcant
difference  in charging, conviction, or sentencing across racial groups when compared to those
who  are similarly situated and who have engaged in similar conduct. Though the CRJA was
enacted over two years ago, two obstacles have made its promised remedies exist largely only on
paper:  confusion about how  to apply its new test and a lack of access to the data needed to
demonstrate  a  significant difference. This Article attempts to overcome these obstacles by
exploring and  interpreting the significant difference test and by analyzing a database of
disparities that enables controls for criminal history and geography (similarly situated) and
overlapping  elements  (similar conduct) based on  comprehensive  data from   the California
Department   of Justice. This Article also presents two case  studies that demonstrate  how
defendants might  establish an initial showing of signfcant difference sufficient to successfully
move for discovery.




      t Colleen V. Chien is a Professor of Law at Berkeley Law School, faculty co-director of the Berkeley
Center for Law and Technology, and founder of the Paper Prisons Initiative.
      tt W. David Ball is Professor of Law at Santa Clara University School of Law.
      ttt William A. Sundstrom is the Stephen and Patricia Schott Professor of Economics of Santa Clara
University. All co-authors are affiliated with the Paper Prisons Initiative (paperprisons.org) and are equal co-
authors on this Article. The Authors thank the California Department of Justice for granting access to its data;
Santa Clara law students Ahmanda Lee, Daniel Grigore, Sarah Jabin, and Anika Kingsley and Santa Clara law
librarians Ellen Platt and Thomas DeGuzman for their exceptional research assistance; Luke Pinkston, Yangxier
Sui, and Rachel Nghe for help with bluebooking; and audiences at the AALS-ABA Academy for Justice, SW
Crim, and Santa Clara Law faculty workshops for their helpful comments on earlier drafts. Pending authorization
from the California Department of Justice, a Paper Prisons RJA database that provides access to data on racial
disparities across California counties will be made available at www.paperprisons.org/RJA. Please send any
correspondence related to this Article to: Colleen V. Chien at cchien@berkeley.edu.


[1]

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most