About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

74 Fla. L. Rev. Forum 1 (2023)

handle is hein.journals/flrf74 and id is 1 raw text is: THE APPROPRIATE APPROPRIATIONS INQUIRY Chad Squitieri* Abstract The Supreme Court is set to hear oral argument this fall concerning whether the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) is unconstitutionally self-funded. The question presented in the case asks whether the statute establishing the CFPB's self-funding scheme, 12 U.S.C. § 5497, violates the Appropriations Clause. But that question is incomplete at best, because although the Appropriations Clause requires that appropriations be made by law, the Appropriations Clause does not itself vest Congress with any authority to make law in the first place. Instead, Congress's authority to make appropriations laws is vested in part by the Necessary and Proper Clause. Thus, the appropriate appropriations inquiry asks not whether Section 5497 violates the Appropriations Clause, but instead whether Section 5497 violates one of Congress's appropriations powers. And deciding that requires asking whether Section 5497 constitutes a necessary and proper means of carrying into execution a constitutionally vested power-which in regards to funding the CFPB, is presumably Congress's power to regulate commerce . . . among the several states. This Essay argues that the Supreme Court should use the upcoming CFPB self-funding case to reorient its appropriations jurisprudence around the specific constitutional text that vests Congress with appropriations authority. Such a reorientation would suggest that, although Congress may empower some entities (such as the post office and national mint) to self-fund themselves through fees, Congress may nonetheless be unable to empower other entities (such as the CFPB) to operate outside of the congressional appropriations process. The difference in constitutionality stems from the different constitutional text (i.e., the different appropriations powers) that Congress must rely on to fund different parts of the federal government. INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................2 I. THE TEXTUAL BASIS FOR CONGRESSIONAL APPROPRIATIONS........................................................................7 A. The Constitution's Two References to Appropriations ...............................................................8 * Assistant Professor of Law, Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law. I thank William Baude, Aaron L. Nielson, Lucia Silecchia, Kevin C. Walsh, and Adam J. White for their feedback on earlier drafts. I also thank Jeffrey Davis for his excellent research assistance. All views contained in this Essay, as well any remaining errors, are mine alone.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most