About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

4 Fed. Juror 1 (1933)

handle is hein.journals/fjbfgj4 and id is 1 raw text is: Fewer and Better Laws
THE FEDERAL JUROR
Bulletin of the
FEDERAL GRAND JURY ASSOCIATION
Southern District of New York
The Editor assomes no  responsbity for the opinions costained in the articles, letters and  contributions  is the Eederal Juror

VOLUME V

JANUARY, 1933

NUMBER

Less Than Unanimous Jury Verdicts

O   UGHT less -than - unanimous
jury verdicts to be permitted?
At the first glance the ques-
tion seems a simple one. The re-
trial of a case imposes a burden
on the courts and on the litigant
which it would be desirable to
avoid. Most action of public bod-
ies is decided by majority vote. If
this is generally fair, why not in
the case of a jury verdict, and
thereby insure against the delay
and expense of a new trial?
But analysis develops many com-
plications. Is the burden a serious
one; how often does a jury dis-
agree and a new trial result? to
how many of these cases was three
a reasonable difference of opinion
among the jurors; in how    many
was the disagreement due to the
obstinacy or unreasonableness of
one or two men? If there was a
reasonable difference of opinion,
would a mere majority verdict be
fair? If one party can only con-
visne seven or eight of the jurors,
and four or five are equally con-
vinced by the other side, ought
there not be a new trial?

By Kenneth Dayton
Chairman of the Conmrittee on Law
Refor  of the Association of the
Bar of the City of New York
To what extent does the rule of
unanimity result in compromise
verdicts which are unjust? It is
generally bejeved that many unan-
imous verdicts are rendered in
which ten or eleven of the jurors
would agree upon a particulor rea-
sonable verdict, but the obtinacy
of the remaining one or two forces
an unfair compromise in order to
reach a unanimous verdict.
Best Judgment in Minority?
On the other hand, it is also
believed from experience that very
frequently those members of the
jury who best understand the case
find themselves in the minority at
the outset, and that the require-
ment of unanimity assures the nec-
essary opportunity for discussion
and argument in the jury room
which brings the majority to a bet-
ter appreciation of the evidence
and of the judge's charge, and ulti-

mately changes their first snap
judgment to a more reasonable
view and leads to a fairer verdict.
Unfortunately we are lacking in
the statistics to answer some of the
foregoing questions, and many of
them by their nature are not sos-
ceptible of statistical analysis. Ac-
cordingly the answer to the princi-
pal question must always remain
more or less a matter of opinion.
lYe can only tabulate the few
known factors, and argue our per-
sonal views on    the  remaining
elements.
Anyone interested in the prob-
lem ought to study the one com-
prehensive report on the question
of which I know, by a committee
of the Federation of Bar Associa-
tions of Western New York, under
the chairmanship of Marion H.
Fisher, Esq., submitted to the an-
nual meeting of the Federation in
June, 1931. The very fact that
this report is so comprehensive and
complete makes it impossible even
to summarize it in an article of
this scope, and I can only refer
very briefly to a few of the salient

ANNUA         L   M  EETING         of the FEDERAL GRAND JURY ASSOCIATION
will be held on Thursday, January 19th,
1933, at 4:00 P. M. at the BAR ASSOCIATION, 36 WEST 44th STREET, NEW YORK, N. Y.
Among the prominent speakers who will address the meeting will be CAPTAIN
RICHARD PEARSON HOBSON, President of the World Narcotic Defense Association
All Federal Grand Jurors are urged to
attend this important meeting. -  ~-     JANUARY         1 9, 1933

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most