About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

2 Facta Universitatis, Series: L. & Pol. 1 (2004)

handle is hein.journals/fauvisie2 and id is 1 raw text is: 













FACTA  UNIVERSITATIS
Series: Law and Politics Vol. 2, N°1, 2004, pp. 1 - 6





       WHAT SHOULD SERBIAN CONSTITUTION BE LIKE

                                 UDC   342.4(497.11)



                                 Ratko Markovik

          Faculty of Law, University of Belgrade and Police Academy,  Belgrade


     Abstract. Even if it does meet all requirements set before it, this does not mean the
     Serbian Constitution will be ideal. De Smith claimed that there is no predefined
     stereotype of an ideal constitution. He believed the form and content of the constitution
     would  depend, first, on the political balance of power at the moment in which the
     constitution is proclaimed, second, on the commonsensical understanding of how
     practically useful certain constitutional solutions are, third, on traditional patterns
     available to politicians and their advisors writing the constitution. DeGaulle was
     referring to the same thing in his famous 1946 Bayeux Speech, where he quoted the
     response of the wise Solon to the question of a Greek, inquiring which constitution was
     the best. Solon replied: First tell me for which people and for what epoch.
     Key  words: Serbian new constitution, short constitution, normative constitution,
                 democratic constitution, firm constitution, modern constitution.




   Leaving  aside opinions on  how  certain issues of constitutional matter should be cov-
ered in the future Serbian Constitution, this constitution should have the following general
characteristics.
    The Serbian  Constitution should be  a new  constitution. It should follow  from the
highest state power standing above other state powers, and this power is constituting, for
it defines rules under which constituted powers are formed. French  authors contend  that
constituting power assumes  two forms. According  to Prelot, the first one occurs when the
constituting authority provides a constitution to the country which has not by  then had
one, or which,  after the adoption of the new  one, no longer has the same  constitution,
which  now  establishes rules that are not initial, yet are novel enough, since the state and
the regime originate from them. This is originary constituting power.1 In the words of Mi-
chel Henri  Fabre, this authority pronounces the new  constitution in an initial, autono-
mous,  and total manner.2 The  second  form is the constituting authority which changes

Received October 2, 2004
M.  Prdlot, J. Boulouis, Institutions politiques et droit constitutionnel, Paris, 1980, p. 214.
2 M.- H. Fabre, Principes rdpublicains de droit constitutionnel, Paris, 1977, p. 153.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most