About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 Ent. L. Rep. 1 (1979-1980)

handle is hein.journals/enterml1 and id is 1 raw text is: 







                              ILAV                    II N4&                   IL111lQ






Actin iDictures Televisin Iadic 4usic Theater IUublishin S)crts


Volume 1, Number I


In this issue:
Supreme Court holds that ASCAP/BMI blanket
licenses to television networks do not constitute
price fixing which is illegal per se under
antitrust  law s  ................................  1
Supreme Court holds there is no First Amendment
privilege preventing inquiry into the state of mind
of those who edit, produce or publish, or into the
editorial process, in libel lawsuits brought by
public figures ............................... 2
FCC's cable television access rules held invalid
by Supreme  Court  ........................... 3
California Court of Appeal upholds preliminary
injunction restraining Olivia Newton-John from
recording for anyone other than MCA, but limits
injunction to term  of recording contract ......... 4
Book and movie based on true incident in life of
Agatha Christie are protected by First Amendment. 5
Federal Court of Appeals affirms FCC decision to
renew license of television station KCOP, without
a hearing, despite FCC's occasionally garbled
rationale for doing  so  ........................ 6
Publisher's share of earnings of musical
composition must be based on most current
accounting available ......................... 7
Educational Programs Calendar ................ 8
Editors' Note ................................ 8





               Lionel S. Sobel Editor
           Eileen L. Selsky Associate Editor
   Copyright © 1979 by the Entertainment Law Reporter
     Publishing Company, 9440 Santa Monica Blvd.,
          Suite 600, Beverly Hills, CA 90210
  Published twice monthly. Subscription rates are $85 per
  year for subscribers in the United States and Canada,
      and $100 per year for subscribers elsewhere.


June1,1979


Entertainment Law Reporter


Supreme Court holds that ASCAP/BMI
blanket licenses to television networks
do not constitute price fixing which is
illegal per se under antitrust laws

  The U.S. Supreme Court has held that the issu-
ance by ASCAP and BMI to CBS of blanket licenses
to copyrighted musical compositions at mutually
pre-negotiated fees is not price fixing per se un-
lawful under the antitrust laws. In so holding, the
Court ruled against CBS, which had initiated the
case with a complaint alleging both antitrust and
copyright violations.
  The CBS action named ASCAP, BMI and their
respective members and affiliates as class action
co-defendants charging, among other things, that
ASCAP and BMI are unlawful monopolies and that
the blanket license practices employed by them con-
stitute illegal price fixing. CBS urged that the issu-
ance of blanket licenses be enjoined and replaced
with a per-use license.
  The issuance of blanket licenses to copyrighted
musical compositions is a practice-which has been
used by both ASCAP and BMI ever since their cre-
ations in 1914 and 1939. The practice evolved from
the practical need to facilitate the administration of
license negotiations and detection of unauthorized
use. With this end in mind, blanket licenses, which
give the licensee an unlimited right to perform any
of the compositions owned by BMI/ASCAP mem-
bers or affiliates during a stated term, were estab-
lished in the music industry.
  The Supreme Court noted that at the time ASCAP
was organized,
... those who performed copyrighted music for profit were
so numerous and widespread, and most performances so
fleeting, as a practical matter it was impossible for the
many individual copyright owners to negotiate with and
license the users and detect unauthorized uses.
   In response to these problems, ASCAP and BMI
were created to act as . . . clearing house(s) for
copyright owners and users to solve.., the ... prob-
lems associated with the licensing of music. As a
result, throughout the years the two organizations
have operated primarily, though not exclusively, un-

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most