About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

79 Md. L. Rev. Online 1 (2020)

handle is hein.journals/endnot79 and id is 1 raw text is: THE BURDEN ON SOCIETY FROM ELEVENTH-HOUR CITIZEN PETITIONS FILED TO SLOW GENERIC DRUGS ROBIN FELDMAN* ABSTRACT The Food and Drug Administration's citizen petition process provides an avenue for ordinary citizens to raise concerns and participate in the regulatory process. Abuse of that process has been documented as an example of the legal maneuvering used by pharmaceutical companies to protect their brand-name drug revenue streams from the introduction of low-cost generics. To date, the financial cost to society of these delays has not been calculated in the literature, which likely hinders the push for policy solutions. Drawing from a previously published data set on 249 citizen petitions, this Article will identify four petitions that were highly likely to have been the final obstacle to a generic drug entering the market. Specifically, the petitions were denied; the FDA approved the generics within one business day of denying the petitions; and the generics came to market within one week of the FDA's approval, signaling that the petitions were the final obstacle standing in the way of the generic's entry to market. Using these four dubious citizen petitions, this Article will find that the total financial cost to society from citizen petition delays was $1.9 billion or $3.6 million per day.' The total financial cost to government-provided insurance programs in the same period was roughly $782 million. This Article will employ a conservative methodology (choosing only four petitions that meet the criteria of but for this citizen petition, the generic would have gone to market). Thus, the estimates are likely low. Citizen petitions that contributed to a generic delay as one of many tactics or for which there was not sufficient volume and usage information were eliminated from consideration in this estimate. © 2020 Robin Feldman. * Arthur J. Goldberg Distinguished Professor of Law, Director of the Center for Innovation (C4i), University of California Hastings Law. I wish to thank Ramy Alsaffar, Colin Burke, Nick Massoni, Sophia Tao, and David Toppelberg for invaluable research assistance. This project was funded in part by a grant from the Laura and John Arnold Foundation. 1. See infra Section I.B. 2. See infra Section I.B.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most