About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

64 Emory L.J. Online 2001 (2014-2015)

handle is hein.journals/emyon64 and id is 1 raw text is: BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU WISH FOR: GOODYEAR, DAIMLER, AND THE EVISCERATION OF GENERAL JURISDICTION Thomas C. Arthur* Richard D. Freer ABSTRACT International Shoe and its progeny permit states to assert general jurisdiction over nonresidents that have continuous and systematic contacts with the forum. In Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown decided in 2011, and Daimler AG v. Bauman decided in early 2014, the Supreme Court made a sharp break from these cases, stating that general jurisdiction based on minimum contacts now exists only where a defendant is at home. The opinions in these cases are unpersuasive. While the Court purported to follow International Shoe and its two prior decisions on general jurisdiction, this simply is not so. Nor does the Court justify its use of an analogy to the traditional basis of domicile to determine to legitimate scope of contacts-based jurisdiction. Arguably, an analogy to presence would be more apt. Worse, these two cases, when added to the Court's grudging approach to specific jurisdiction, put some plaintiffs at risk of being unable to bring a defendant to justice in an American court. Goodyear and Daimler could have been decided on far narrower grounds; the Court should read them in the future to be limited to those grounds. It should restrict the novel at home test to cases that have no relation at all, not even the plaintiffs residence, to the forum state. For all other cases of general jurisdiction the Court should provide a 'floor of appropriate systematic and continuous contacts necessary in every case. And it should further direct the lower courts to employ the 'fairness factors developed in its specific jurisdiction cases to ensure that jurisdiction will be available in those cases in which it is still needed. L.Q.C. Lamar Professor of Law, Emory University. Robert Howell Hall Professor of Law, Emory University.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most