About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

71 Duke L.J. Online 1 (2021-2022)

handle is hein.journals/duljo71 and id is 1 raw text is: Duke Law Journal Online VOLUME 71 SEPTEMBER 2021 THE SUPREME COURT'S RETICENT QUALIFIED IMMUNITY RETREAT KATHERINE MIMS CROCKERt ABSTRACT The recent outcry against qualified immunity, a doctrine that disallows damages actions against government officials for a wide swath of constitutional claims, has been deafening. But when the Supreme Court in November 2020 and February 2021 invalidated grants of qualified immunity based on reasoning at the heart of the doctrine for the first time since John Roberts became Chief Justice, the response was muted. With initial evaluations and competing understandings coming from legal commentators in the months since, this Essay explores what these cases appear to say about qualified immunity for today and tomorrow. The Essay traces idealistic, pessimistic, and optimistic impressions of these cases' importance from the perspective of a qualified-immunity critic. The Essay argues that the optimistic view probably gets things right in that the Court is taking tentative steps forward by precluding some of the doctrine's most extreme consequences. The Essay then contends that this modest move nevertheless demonstrates why those concerned about qualified immunity should focus not only on the courts, but also on the other branches of government-and not only on one doctrine, but also on constitutional-tort law as a whole. In and beyond the recent reform-minded moment, we should think big about how to improve constitutional enforcement: bigger than the judiciary and bigger than qualified immunity. INTRODUCTION If you missed a recent Supreme Court case rejecting a claim of qualified immunity (yes, rejecting a claim of qualified immunity) without merits briefing or oral argument, you are not alone. With the decision issued November 2, 2020, it was bound to get lost in the Copyright © 2021 Katherine Mims Crocker. t Assistant Professor of Law, William & Mary Law School. For thoughtful guidance and feedback, thank you to Will Baude, Brandon Hasbrouck, Alli Orr Larsen, Colin Miller, Bill Mims, and Joanna Schwartz. For tireless and skillful research assistance, thank you to William & Mary law students Bobby Nevin and Melissa Ruby and to William & Mary law librarian Michael Umberger.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most